首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition >The evolution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all?
【2h】

The evolution of anterior sector venous drainage in right lobe living donor liver transplantation: does one technique fit all?

机译:右叶活体供肝移植中前扇形静脉引流的演变:一种技术适合所有人吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), an adequate hepatic venous outflow constitutes one of the basic principles of a technically successful procedure. The issue of whether the anterior sector (AS) of the right lobe (RL) graft should or should not be routinely drained has been controversial. The aim of this 10-year, single-center, retrospective cohort study was to review the evolution of our hepatic venous outflow reconstruction technique in RL grafts and evaluate the impact of routine AS drainage strategy on the outcome. The study group consisted of 582 primary RL LDLT performed between July 2004 and December 2014. The cases were divided into 3 consecutive periods with different AS venous outflow reconstruction techniques, which included middle hepatic vein (MHV) drainage in Era 1 (n=119), a more selective AS drainage with cryopreserved homologous grafts in Era 2 (n=391), and routine segment 5 and/or 8 oriented AS drainage with synthetic grafts in Era 3 (n=72). Intraoperative portal flow measurement with routine splenic artery ligation (SAL) technique (in RL grafts with a portal flow of ≥ 250 mL/min/100 g liver tissue) was added later in Era 3. These 3 groups were compared in terms of recipient and donor demographics, surgical characteristics and short-term outcome. The rate of AS venous drainage varied from 58.8% in Era 1 and 35.0% in Era 2 to 73.6% in Era 3 (P<0.001). Perioperative mortality rate of recipients significantly decreased over the years (15.1% in Era 1 and 8.7% in Era 2 vs. 2.8% in Era 3, P=0.01). After the addition of SAL technique in the 45 cases, there was only 1 graft loss and no perioperative mortality. One-year recipient survival rate was also significantly higher in Era 3 (79.6% in Era 1 and 86.1% in Era 2 vs. 92.1% in Era 3, P=0.002). Routine AS drainage via segment 5 and/or 8 veins using synthetic grafts is a technique to fit all RL grafts in LDLT. Addition of SAL effectively prevents early graft dysfunction and significantly improves the outcome.
机译:在活体供体肝移植(LDLT)中,充足的肝静脉流出构成了技术上成功的手术的基本原则之一。是否应该常规引流右叶(RL)移植物的前部门(AS)一直是一个有争议的问题。这项为期10年,单中心,回顾性队列研究的目的是回顾我们在RL移植中肝静脉流出重建技术的发展,并评估常规AS引流策略对预后的影响。该研究组由2004年7月至2014年12月进行的582例原发性RL LDLT组成。病例被分为3个连续的时期,采用不同的AS静脉流出重建技术,包括第1时代的肝中静脉(MHV)引流(n = 119) ,在时代2(n = 391)中使用冷冻保存的同源移植物进行选择性更高的AS引流(n = 391),在时代3中使用合成移植物进行常规5和/或8定向的AS引流(n = 72)。在第3阶段稍后添加术中常规脾动脉结扎术(SAL)技术(在门静脉血流≥250 mL / min / 100 g肝组织的RL移植物中)的术中门血测量。比较了这三组的接受者和接受者供体的人口统计学,手术特征和短期结果。 AS静脉引流率从第1阶段的58.8%和第2阶段的35.0%到第3阶段的73.6%(P <0.001)。多年来,接受者的围手术期死亡率显着降低(第1代为15.1%,第2代为8.7%,第3代为2.8%,P = 0.01)。在45例患者中加入SAL技术后,仅发生1例移植物丢失,无围手术期死亡。第三代的一年接受者生存率也显着更高(第一代为79.6%,第二代为86.1%,第三代为92.1%,P = 0.002)。使用合成移植物通过第5段和/或第8段静脉进行常规AS引流是一种将所有RL移植物适合LDLT的技术。 SAL的添加可有效预防早期移植物功能障碍,并显着改善预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号