首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery >The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age
【2h】

The Effect of Mode of Delivery and Hospital Type on Newborn Hearing Screening Results Using Otoacoustic Emissions: Based on Screening Age

机译:分娩方式和医院类型对耳声筛查新生儿听力筛查结果的影响:基于筛查年龄

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is well known that false positive on newborn hearing screening increases cost and maternal anxiety and worry. We aimed to evaluate the influence of mode of delivery (cesarean, vaginal) and hospital type (private, public) on false positives first screening test based on screening age. Identification and control of these factors can reduce the rate of false positives. Overall, 2784 infants were evaluated by otoacoustic emissions test. Hearing screening test was performed before hospital discharge. Finally, rate of the false-positive between both delivery group and hospital types were compared on the basis of screening age. False-positive results are obtained when a condition is not present, but the test results indicate that it is present. False positive rate in the first screening test in vaginal delivery was significantly higher than cesarean delivery and rate of significantly decreased with screening age. This reduction was observed only in cesarean delivery. Also the rate of false positives in public hospital is 2.2 fold higher than private hospital (P = 0.000) and with increase in screening age, the rate of False positive is significantly reduced in private hospitals while this decrease is not observed in public hospital. Screening test be retarded as much as possible in cesarean group and private hospital and be conducted just prior to hospital discharge also in public hospital, screening test are done in a separate room. In this way, false positive can be reduced by about six times and the cost and concerns imposed by the rate of false positives minimized.
机译:众所周知,新生儿听力筛查的假阳性会增加成本,并增加产妇的焦虑和忧虑。我们旨在评估分娩方式(剖宫产,阴道)和医院类型(私立,公立)对基于筛查年龄的假阳性首次筛查测试的影响。对这些因素的识别和控制可以减少误报率。总体上,通过耳声发射测试对2784例婴儿进行了评估。出院前进行了听力筛查测试。最后,根据筛查年龄比较分娩组和医院类型之间的假阳性率。当不存在某种条件时会获得假阳性结果,但是测试结果表明存在这种情况。阴道分娩首次筛查试验中的假阳性率显着高于剖宫产,并且随着筛查年龄的增加,假阳性率显着降低。仅在剖宫产中观察到这种减少。公立医院的误报率也比私立医院高2.2倍(P = 0.000),并且随着筛查年龄的增加,私立医院的误报率显着降低,而在公立医院则没有这种下降。剖宫产和私家医院的筛查试验应尽可能推迟,并且在出院前也要在公立医院进行筛查试验,筛查试验应在单独的房间进行。通过这种方式,可以将误报率降低大约六倍,并将误报率所带来的成本和担忧降至最低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号