首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medicines >Why We Need Minimum Basic Requirements in Science for Acupuncture Education
【2h】

Why We Need Minimum Basic Requirements in Science for Acupuncture Education

机译:为什么我们需要针灸教育科学的最低基本要求

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As enthusiasm for alternatives to pharmaceuticals and surgery grows, healthcare consumers are turning increasingly to physical medicine modalities such as acupuncture. However, they may encounter obstacles in accessing acupuncture due to several reasons, such as the inability to locate a suitable practitioner, insufficient reimbursement for treatment, or difficulty gaining a referral due to perceived lack of evidence or scientific rigor by specialists. Claims made about a range of treatment paradigms outstrip evidence and students in acupuncture courses are thus led to believe that the approaches they learn are effective and clinically meaningful. Critical inquiry and critical analysis of techniques taught are often omitted, leading to unquestioning acceptance, adoption, and implementation into practice of approaches that may or may not be rational and effective. Acupuncture education for both licensed physicians (DOs and MDs) and non-physicians needs to include science (i.e., explanation of its effects based on contemporary explanations of biological processes), evidence, and critical thinking. Erroneous notions concerning its mechanisms such as moving “stuck Qi (Chi)” or “energy” with needles and that this energy stagnates at specific, tiny locations on the body called acupuncture points invite errors in methodologic design. For example, researchers may select sham and verum point locations that overlap considerably in their neural connections, leading to nonsignificant differences between the two interventions. Furthermore, attributing the effects of acupuncture to metaphorical and arcane views of physiology limits both acceptance and validation of acupuncture in both research and clinical settings. Finally, the content and quality of education and clinical exposure across acupuncture programs varies widely, with currently no minimum basic educational requirements in a scientific methodology. Considering the pressures mounting on clinicians to practice in an evidence-based and scientific manner that also demonstrates cost-effectiveness, acupuncture schools and continuing medical education (CME) courses should provide their students a strong foundation in rational approaches supported by research.
机译:随着人们对替代药物和外科手术的热情不断提高,医疗保健消费者正越来越多地转向针灸等物理医学方式。但是,由于一些原因,例如无法找到合适的执业医师,治疗报销不足或由于专家缺乏知觉或科学严谨等原因,他们很难在针灸方面遇到障碍。关于一系列治疗范例的主张超过了证据,因此针灸课程的学生被认为他们学习的方法是有效的并且具有临床意义。经常省略对所教授技术的批判性探究和批判性分析,从而毫无疑问地接受,采用和实施了可能合理或无效的方法。对持证医师(DO和MD)和非医师的针灸教育都应包括科学(即根据当代对生物过程的解释来解释其作用),证据和批判性思维。有关其机理的错误观念,例如用针移动“粘滞气”或“能量”,并且这种能量滞留在人体上特定的微小位置(称为穴位),这会导致方法学设计上的错误。例如,研究人员可能会选择假的和假的点位置,这些位置在神经连接上有相当大的重叠,从而导致两种干预措施之间的差异不显着。此外,将针灸的作用归因于生理学的隐喻和神秘的观点,在研究和临床环境中都限制了针灸的接受和验证。最后,针灸课程的教育内容和质量以及临床接触情况差异很大,目前在科学方法论中没有最低的基础教育要求。考虑到临床医生以循证科学的方式进行实践的压力也证明了成本效益,针灸学校和继续医学教育(CME)课程应为学生提供由研究支持的合理方法的坚实基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号