首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine >Efficacy comparison between manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification in cataract patients: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Efficacy comparison between manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification in cataract patients: a meta-analysis

机译:人工小切口白内障手术与白内障超声乳化术疗效比较的Meta分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: Systematic review of manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification (PHACO) on the postoperative visual quality and surgical complications. Methods: Relevant literatures on clinical efficacy of PHACO and MSICS were included by retrieving in Medline, PubMed, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) and Chinese Academic Journal (CNKI) databases. Meta-analysis was conducted by RevMan5.0 software with OR and its 95% CI for the effect size. Results: A total of ten documents were included in the study. Uncorrected visual acuity 1 week after surgery (OR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.67 ~ 1.06, P=0.15), post-operative capsular rupture (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.73~1.58, P=0.72), and corneal edema (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.70~1.16, P=0.42) between MSICS and PHACO showed no statistical difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Clinical efficacy and complications of MSICS was similar tothat of PHACO.
机译:目的:系统评价人工小切口白内障手术(MSICS)和超声乳化术(PHACO)的术后视觉质量和手术并发症。方法:通过检索Medline,PubMed,中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和《中国学术期刊》(CNKI)数据库,收集有关PHACO和MSICS临床疗效的相关文献。通过RevMan5.0软件使用OR及其效应大小的95%CI进行荟萃分析。结果:总共十份文献被纳入研究。术后1周未矫正视力(OR = 0.84,95%CI:0.67〜1.06,P = 0.15),术后囊破裂(OR = 1.07,95%CI:0.73〜1.58,P = 0.72)和角膜MSICS和PHACO之间的水肿(OR = 0.90,95%CI:0.70〜1.16,P = 0.42)无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。结论:MSICS的临床疗效和并发症与PHACO相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号