首页> 外文期刊>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery >Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery: six-week results of a randomized control trial.
【24h】

Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery: six-week results of a randomized control trial.

机译:白内障手术后内皮细胞损失的比较:超声乳化术与人工小切口白内障手术:随机对照试验的六周结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare endothelial cell loss in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and by manual small-incision cataract surgery (SICS). SETTINGS: Tertiary care ophthalmic center, India. METHODS: A complete ophthalmologic examination and endothelial specular microscopy were performed preoperatively and 1 and 6 weeks postoperatively in patients having cataract surgery. The endothelial cell count (ECC) was calculated manually and automatically using an LSM 12000 specular microscope. Patients were randomly allocated to have SICS or phacoemulsification using a random number table. Phacoemulsification was performed using the stop-and-chop technique and SICS, by viscoexpression. RESULTS: The study evaluated 200 patients, 100 in each group. The mean preoperative ECC by the manual counting method was 2950.7 cells/mm(2) in the phacoemulsification group and 2852.5 cells/mm(2) in the SICS group and by the automated counting method, 3053.7 cells/mm(2) and 2975.3 cells/mm(2), respectively. The difference at 6 weeks was 543.4 cells/mm(2) and 505.9 cells/mm(2), respectively, by the manual method (P = .44) and 474.2 cells/mm(2) and 456.1 cells/mm(2), respectively, by the automated method (P = .98). The corrected distance visual acuity at 6 weeks was better than 6/18 in 98.5% of eyes in the phacoemulsification group and 97.3% of eyes in the SICS group. CONCLUSION: There were no clinically or statistically significant differences in ECC loss or visual acuity between phacoemulsification and SICS, although there was a small difference in the astigmatic shift.
机译:目的:比较白内障手术中通过超声乳化术和人工小切口白内障手术(SICS)的内皮细胞损失。地点:印度三级保健眼科中心。方法:对白内障手术患者在术前,术后1周和6周进行全面的眼科检查和内皮镜检查。内皮细胞计数(ECC)是使用LSM 12000镜面显微镜手动和自动计算的。使用随机数表将患者随机分配为进行SICS或超声乳化术。使用停止和斩波技术和SICS通过粘胶表达进行超声乳化。结果:该研究评估了200名患者,每组100名。超声乳化术组人工计数法术前平均ECC为2950.7细胞/ mm(2),SICS组平均术前ECC为2852.5细胞/ mm(2),自动计数法为3053.7细胞/ mm(2)和2975.3细胞。 / mm(2)。通过手动方法(P = 0.44)和474.2细胞/ mm(2)和456.1细胞/ mm(2),第6周的差异分别为543.4细胞/ mm(2)和505.9细胞/ mm(2)。分别采用自动方法(P = .98)。白内障超声乳化组的98.5%的眼睛和SICS组的97.3%的眼睛在6周时的矫正远视力优于6/18。结论:超声乳化术和SICS术中ECC丢失或视敏度在临床或统计学上没有显着差异,尽管散光偏移有很小的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号