首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries
【2h】

Who Benefits from National Estuaries? Applying the FEGS Classification System to Identify Ecosystem Services and their Beneficiaries

机译:谁从国家河口中受益?应用FEGS分类系统识别生态系统服务及其受益者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In spite of their perceived value, the widespread implementation of ecosystem services assessments has been limited because of perceptions of being too technical, too expensive, or requiring special expertise. For example, federal estuary management programs have widely used ecosystem services concepts to frame management issues and communicate with stakeholders. Yet, indicators assessed, monitored, and reported in estuarine management still have traditionally focused on ecological conditions, with weak connections, if any, to social or economic outcomes. Approaches are needed which expand the range of ecosystem services that can be considered, link ecosystem services explicitly to different stakeholder groups, facilitate effective communication with economists and other social scientists, and expand the array of available valuation techniques. We applied the concept of final ecosystem goods and services to review the broad suite of ecosystem services and their beneficiaries relevant to the management of two federal programs for estuary management, the National Estuary Program (NEP) and the National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS). The Final Ecosystem Goods and Services Classification System provided a structured framework for connecting ecosystem services to their beneficiaries and the environments providing them. Document analysis of management plans assessed the degree to which these programs consider ecosystem services, their beneficiaries, and habitats within the estuarine watershed. The hierarchical list of final ecosystem goods and services generated from document analysis serves as a tool for defining management goals, identifying stakeholders, developing meaningful indicators, and conducting valuation studies in estuarine management planning efforts. Though developed here for estuarine management, the keyword hierarchy and final ecosystem goods and services approach have broad applicability and transferability to other environmental management scenarios.
机译:尽管具有生态价值评估的价值,但是由于人们认为技术太过昂贵,成本太高或需要专门知识,使得生态系统服务评估的广泛实施受到了限制。例如,联邦河口管理计划已广泛使用生态系统服务概念来界定管理问题并与利益相关者进行沟通。然而,在河口管理中评估,监测和报告的指标传统上仍然侧重于生态条件,与社会或经济成果之间的联系薄弱(如果有的话)。需要采取一些方法来扩大可以考虑的生态系统服务范围,将生态系统服务明确地链接到不同的利益相关者群体,促进与经济学家和其他社会科学家的有效沟通,并扩展可用的估值技术。我们应用了最终生态系统产品和服务的概念来审查与两个联邦河口管理计划,国家河口计划(NEP)和国家河口研究储备系统(NERRS)的管理相关的广泛的生态系统服务及其受益者。最终生态系统商品和服务分类系统提供了一个结构化框架,用于将生态系统服务与其受益人和提供受益人的环境联系起来。对管理计划的文件分析评估了这些计划在多大程度上考虑了生态系统服务,其受益人以及河口流域内的栖息地。通过文件分析生成的最终生态系统商品和服务的分层列表,可作为定义管理目标,确定利益相关者,开发有意义的指标以及进行河口管理规划工作的评估研究的工具。尽管此处是为河口管理开发的,但是关键字层次结构和最终的生态系统商品和服务方法在其他环境管理方案中具有广泛的适用性和可移植性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号