首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The net return from animal activity in agro-ecosystems: trading off benefits from ecosystem services against costs from crop damage
【2h】

The net return from animal activity in agro-ecosystems: trading off benefits from ecosystem services against costs from crop damage

机译:农业生态系统中动物活动的净收益:在生态系统服务的收益与作物损害的成本之间进行权衡

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Animals provide benefits to agriculture through the provision of ecosystem services, but also inflict costs such as damaging crops. These benefits and costs are mostly examined independently, rather than comparing the trade-offs of animal activity in the same system and quantifying the net return from beneficial minus detrimental activities. Here, I examine the net return associated with the activity of seed-eating birds in almond orchards by quantifying the economic costs and benefits of bird consumption of almonds. Pre-harvest, the consumption of harvestable almonds by birds cost growers AUD$57.50 ha -1 when averaged across the entire plantation. Post-harvest, the same bird species provide an ecosystem service by removing mummified nuts from trees that growers otherwise need to remove to reduce threats from fungal infection or insect pest infestations. The value of this ecosystem service ranged from AUD$82.50 ha -1–$332.50 ha -1 based on the replacement costs of mechanical or manual removal of mummified nuts, respectively. Hence, bird consumption of almonds yielded a positive net return of AUD$25–$275 ha -1 averaged across the entire plantation. However, bird activity varied spatially resulting in positive net returns occurring primarily at the edges of crops where activity was higher, compared to negative net returns in crop interiors. Moreover, partial mummy nut removal by birds meant that bird activity may only reduce costs to growers rather than replace these costs completely. Similar cost-benefit trade-offs exist across nature, and quantifying net returns can better inform land management decisions such as when to control pests or promote ecosystem service provision.
机译:动物通过提供生态系统服务为农业带来好处,但也造成诸如破坏农作物之类的代价。这些收益和成本大多是独立检查的,而不是在同一系统中比较动物活动的权衡取舍,并量化有益的有害活动的净收益。在这里,我通过量化杏仁鸟食的经济成本和收益,研究了与杏仁园中食种子鸟类的活动相关的净收益。收获前,鸟类的可食用杏仁消耗使整个种植园的平均花销达到了57.50澳元ha -1 。收获后,相同的鸟类通过从树上去除木乃伊来提供生态系统服务,否则种植者需要去除木乃伊以减少真菌感染或虫害侵袭的威胁。根据机械或手动去除木乃伊坚果的重置成本,该生态系统服务的价值在AUD $ 82.50 ha -1 – $ 332.50 ha -1 之间。因此,在整个种植园中,食用杏仁的鸟类鸟食产生的净净收益为AUD $ 25– $ 275 ha -1 。但是,鸟类活动在空间上变化,导致正净回报率主要发生在作物活动活跃度较高的作物边缘,而作物内部的负净回报率却较高。此外,禽只部分清除木乃伊坚果意味着禽只活动可能只会减少种植者的成本,而不能完全取代这些成本。大自然之间也存在类似的成本-收益权衡,量化净收益可以更好地指导土地管理决策,例如何时控制害虫或促进生态系统服务的提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号