首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >Health Well-Being and Energy Poverty in Europe: A Comparative Study of 32 European Countries
【2h】

Health Well-Being and Energy Poverty in Europe: A Comparative Study of 32 European Countries

机译:欧洲的健康福利与能源贫困:32个欧洲国家的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Despite growing pan-European interest in and awareness of the wide-ranging health and well-being impacts of energy poverty—which is characterised by an inability to secure adequate levels of energy services in the home—the knowledge base is largely British-centric and dominated by single-country studies. In response, this paper investigates the relationship between energy poverty, health and well-being across 32 European countries, using 2012 data from the European Quality of Life Survey. We find an uneven concentration of energy poverty, poor health, and poor well-being across Europe, with Eastern and Central Europe worst affected. At the intersection of energy poverty and health, there is a higher incidence of poor health (both physical and mental) amongst the energy poor populations of most countries, compared to non-energy poor households. Interestingly, we find the largest disparities in health and well-being levels between energy poor and non-energy poor households occur within relatively equal societies, such as Sweden and Slovenia. As well as the unique challenges brought about by rapidly changing energy landscapes in these countries, we also suggest the relative deprivation theory and processes of social comparison hold some value in explaining these findings.
机译:尽管泛欧洲越来越关注能源贫困对健康和福祉的广泛影响(其特点是无法确保家庭中提供足够的能源服务),但人们对能源贫困的广泛关注和认识,但知识库在很大程度上以英国为中心,以单国研究为主。因此,本文使用欧洲生活质量调查(European Life of Survey)2012年的数据,调查了32个欧洲国家的能源贫困,健康与福祉之间的关系。我们发现整个欧洲的能源贫困,健康状况不佳和福利状况不均,其中东欧和中欧受影响最严重。在能源贫困与健康的交汇处,与非能源贫困的家庭相比,大多数国家的能源贫困人口中健康不良(身心健康)的发生率更高。有趣的是,我们发现,在相对平等的社会(例如瑞典和斯洛文尼亚)中,能源贫困家庭和非能源贫困家庭之间在健康和福祉水平上的最大差异。除了这些国家迅速变化的能源格局带来的独特挑战之外,我们还建议相对剥夺理论和社会比较的过程在解释这些发现方面具有一定的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号