首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >Evaluation of the Cult-Dip Plus dip slide method for urinary tract infection.
【2h】

Evaluation of the Cult-Dip Plus dip slide method for urinary tract infection.

机译:Cult-Dip Plus浸片法对尿路感染的评估。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM--To evaluate the Cult-Dip Plus (Merck, Germany), a bacteriological culture test for detecting uropathogens. METHODS--Cult-Dip Plus consists of Brolacin (CLED) and MacConkey agar, each containing methylumbelliferylglucuronide (MUG). Using 1022 urine samples, this product was compared with the routine method of calibrated loop inoculated CLED and blood agar for screening urine for uropathogens. The MUG test for identifying Escherichia coli was also evaluated. RESULTS--Compared with the routine method, Cult-Dip Plus has a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 88.3%, 98.0%, 91.9%, and 97.1%, respectively. The MUG test correctly identified 92% of E coli isolates with a sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of 91.6%, 95.2%, and 93.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION--Cult-Dip Plus appears to be an alternative method to the calibrate loop method for detecting uropathogens. The MUG test permits rapid, reliable and inexpensive identification of E coli.
机译:目的-评估Cult-Dip Plus(德国默克),这是一种用于检测尿路致病菌的细菌培养试验。方法-Cult-Dip Plus由Brolacin(CLED)和MacConkey琼脂组成,每个琼脂均含有甲基伞形基葡糖醛酸(MUG)。使用1022份尿液样品,将该产品与校准回路接种CLED和血琼脂的常规方法进行比较,以筛查尿液中的尿路病原体。还对用于鉴定大肠杆菌的MUG测试进行了评估。结果-与常规方法相比,Cult-Dip Plus的敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为88.3%,98.0%,91.9%和97.1%。 MUG测试正确鉴定出92%的大肠杆菌分离株,其敏感性,特异性和阳性预测值分别为91.6%,95.2%和93.6%。结论-Cult-Dip Plus似乎是用于检测尿路致病菌的校准环法的替代方法。 MUG测试可以快速,可靠和廉价地鉴定大肠杆菌。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号