首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >IS TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION COST-EFFECTIVE IN PEOPLE WITH DIABETES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC EVIDENCE
【2h】

IS TREATMENT OF DEPRESSION COST-EFFECTIVE IN PEOPLE WITH DIABETES? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE ECONOMIC EVIDENCE

机译:糖尿病患者治疗抑郁症是否有效?对经济证据的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Depression is common in diabetes and linked to a wide range of adverse outcomes. UK policy indicates that depression should be treated using conventional psychological treatments in a stepped care framework. This review aimed to identify current economic evidence of psychological treatments for depression among people with diabetes.>Method: Electronic search strategies (conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, NHS EED) combined clinical and economic search terms to identify full economic evaluations of the relevant interventions. Prespecified screening and inclusion criteria were used. Standardized data extraction and critical appraisal were conducted and the results summarized qualitatively.>Results: Excluding duplicates, 1,516 studies for co-morbid depression and diabetes were screened. Four economic evaluations were identified. The studies found that the interventions improved health status, reduced depression and were cost-effective compared with usual care. The studies were all U.S.-based and evaluated collaborative care programs that included psychological therapies. Critical appraisal indicated limitations with the study designs, analysis and results for all studies.>Conclusions: The review highlighted the paucity of evidence in this area. The four studies indicated the potential of interventions to reduce depression and be cost-effective compared with usual care. Two studies reported costs per QALY gained of USD 267 to USD 4,317, whilst two studies reported the intervention dominated usual care, with net savings of USD 440 to USD 612 and net gains in patient free days or QALYs.
机译:>目标:抑郁症在糖尿病患者中很常见,并且与多种不良后果有关。英国的政策表明,应该在阶梯式护理框架内使用常规的心理治疗方法来治疗抑郁症。这项审查旨在确定目前对糖尿病患者进行心理治疗的经济证据。>方法:电子搜索策略(在MEDLINE,EMBASE,PsycINFO,CINAHL,NHS EED中进行)结合了临床和经济搜索条件确定有关干预措施的全面经济评估。使用预先指定的筛选和纳入标准。进行标准化的数据提取和关键评估,并对结果进行定性总结。>结果:除重复项外,共筛查了1,516项针对合并症的抑郁症和糖尿病的研究。确定了四项经济评估。研究发现,与常规护理相比,这些干预措施可以改善健康状况,减少抑郁症并且具有成本效益。这些研究都是基于美国的,并评估了包括心理治疗在内的合作医疗计划。严格评估表明所有研究的研究设计,分析和结果均受限制。>结论:该评论强调了该领域缺乏证据。这四项研究表明,与常规护理相比,干预措施具有减少抑郁症和降低成本的潜力。两项研究报告说,每QALY的费用增加了267美元至4,317美元,而两项研究报告了以干预为主的常规护理,净节省了440美元至612美元,患者免费日数或QALY净增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号