首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cambridge Open Access >Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestockproduction systems on different aspects of sustainability
【2h】

Animal Board Invited Review: Comparing conventional and organic livestockproduction systems on different aspects of sustainability

机译:动物委员会邀请审查:比较常规和有机牲畜可持续发展各个方面的生产系统

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophicationpotential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lowermicrobiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full timeemployee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potentialper unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higherbeneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimesconventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity,which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animalspecies, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventionallivestock production systems.
机译:为了可持续地为日益增长的世界人口的粮食安全做出贡献,畜牧生产系统面临着提高生产水平,减少环境影响,具有经济可行性和社会责任感的挑战。有关当前畜牧生产系统可持续性绩效的知识可能有助于制定未来系统的策略。我们的研究系统地概述了常规和有机畜牧生产系统之间在可持续性方面的广泛差异以及同行评审文献中可提供的动物种类。对系统进行了经济,生产力,环境影响,动物福利和公共卫生方面的比较。审查仅限于奶牛,肉牛,猪,肉鸡和蛋鸡,以及欧洲,北美和新西兰。每个指标的结果如文章中所述,而无需执行其他计算。在4171个初始搜索结果中,分析了179条文章。研究在指标,研究设计,样本量,位置和环境方面差异很大。一些研究使用了少量样本。没有研究同时分析可持续性的各个方面。传统系统的单位产品劳动力需求较低,每头动物的收入风险更低,每单位时间每只动物的产量更高,繁殖数量更高,饲料转化率更低,土地使用量更低,酸化和富营养化程度通常较低单位产品的潜力,母牛乳房健康相等或更好,以及相等或更低微生物污染。有机系统的每头动物或全职收入较高员工,对生物多样性的影响较小,富营养化和酸化潜力较低每单位土地,细菌中抗生素耐药性的可能性相等或更低,并且更高牛奶中的有益脂肪酸含量。对于大多数可持续发展方面,有时传统系统(有时甚至是有机系统)的性能更高,除了生产率,在传统系统中始终较高。对于许多方面和动物物种,需要更多数据来推断有机和常规之间的差异畜牧生产系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号