首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis
【2h】

Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis

机译:用于中央静脉插管的超声定位设备:荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives To assess the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound guided central venous cannulation.>Data sources 15 electronic bibliographic databases, covering biomedical, science, social science, health economics, and grey literature.>Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.>Populations Patients scheduled for central venous access.>Intervention reviewed Guidance using real time two dimensional ultrasonography or Doppler needles and probes compared with the anatomical landmark method of cannulation.>Data extraction Risk of failed catheter placement (primary outcome), risk of complications from placement, risk of failure on first attempt at placement, number of attempts to successful catheterisation, and time (seconds) to successful catheterisation.>Data synthesis 18 trials (1646 participants) were identified. Compared with the landmark method, real time two dimensional ultrasound guidance for cannulating the internal jugular vein in adults was associated with a significantly lower failure rate both overall (relative risk 0.14, 95% confidence interval 0.06 to 0.33) and on the first attempt (0.59, 0.39 to 0.88). Limited evidence favoured two dimensional ultrasound guidance for subclavian vein and femoral vein procedures in adults (0.14, 0.04 to 0.57 and 0.29, 0.07 to 1.21, respectively). Three studies in infants confirmed a higher success rate with two dimensional ultrasonography for internal jugular procedures (0.15, 0.03 to 0.64). Doppler guided cannulation of the internal jugular vein in adults was more successful than the landmark method (0.39, 0.17 to 0.92), but the landmark method was more successful for subclavian vein procedures (1.48, 1.03 to 2.14). No significant difference was found between these techniques for cannulation of the internal jugular vein in infants. An indirect comparison of relative risks suggested that two dimensional ultrasonography would be more successful than Doppler guidance for subclavian vein procedures in adults (0.09, 0.02 to 0.38).>Conclusions Evidence supports the use of two dimensional ultrasonography for central venous cannulation.
机译:>目的以评估超声引导的中心静脉插管的临床有效性。>数据来源 15个电子书目数据库,涵盖生物医学,科学,社会科学,卫生经济学和灰色医学文献。>设计对随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。>人群计划安排中心静脉通路的患者。>干预回顾使用实时两项指南>数据提取:导管置入失败的风险(主要结果),置入并发症的风险,初次尝试置入失败的风险, >数据综合共确定18项试验(1646名参与者)。与界标法相比,用于成人颈内静脉插管的实时二维超声引导与总体(相对风险0.14,95%置信区间0.06至0.33)和首次尝试(0.59)的失效率均显着降低。 ,从0.39到0.88)。有限的证据支持对成年人的锁骨下静脉和股静脉进行二维超声引导(分别为0.14、0.04至0.57和0.29、0.07至1.21)。两项针对婴儿的研究证实了采用二维超声对颈内动脉手术的成功率更高(0.15、0.03至0.64)。多普勒引导成人颈内静脉插管术比界标方法(0.39,0.17至0.92)更成功,但界标方法在锁骨下静脉手术中更为成功(1.48,1.03至2.14)。在这些用于婴儿颈内静脉插管的技术之间没有发现显着差异。相对危险度的间接比较表明,对于成年人的锁骨下静脉手术,二维超声检查比多普勒引导更成功(0.09,0.02至0.38)。>结论证据支持二维超声检查用于中心性静脉插管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号