...
首页> 外文期刊>The British Journal of Surgery >Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices.
【24h】

Randomized clinical trial of a modified Seldinger technique for open central venous cannulation for implantable access devices.

机译:改良的Seldinger技术用于植入式进入装置的开放式中心静脉插管的随机临床试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Totally implantable access ports (TIAPs) are often used for patients who need permanent venous access. The primary success rate using direct open insertion is about 80 per cent, so rescue strategies are needed. This study compared the primary success rates of standard open insertion and a modified Seldinger technique. METHODS: This randomized trial recruited 164 patients scheduled for primary implantation of a TIAP and compared two interventions. The primary endpoint was the success rate of the implantation technique. RESULTS: The primary success rates were similar: 66 (80 per cent) of 82 patients who had standard open insertion versus 69 (84 per cent) of 82 patients undergoing the modified Seldinger method (P = 0.686). A logistic mixed regression analysis including treatment group, age, Karnofsky index, body mass index and surgeon's experience showed no advantage for the Seldinger method: odds ratio 1.30 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.62 to 2.70). TIAPs were eventually implanted successfully in 163 (99.4 per cent) of 164 patients. In 11 patients randomized to standard surgery, the Seldinger method was a successful rescue strategy. CONCLUSION: The primary success rate was similar for both open insertion methods. The modified Seldinger method is useful if standard open insertion fails. Registration number: ISRCTN 52368201 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).
机译:简介:全植入式进入端口(TIAP)通常用于需要永久性静脉通路的患者。使用直接开放式插入术的主要成功率约为80%,因此需要采取抢救策略。这项研究比较了标准开放插入和改良的Seldinger技术的主要成功率。方法:该随机试验招募了164位计划进行TIAP初次植入的患者,并比较了两种干预措施。主要终点是植入技术的成功率。结果:初步成功率相似:82例接受标准开放插入的患者中有66例(80%),而接受改良Seldinger方法的82例患者中有69例(84%)(P = 0.686)。包括治疗组,年龄,卡诺夫斯基指数,体重指数和外科医生经验在内的对数混合回归分析表明,Seldinger方法没有优势:优势比为1.30(95%置信区间为0.62至2.70)。 TIAPs最终成功植入了164例患者中的163例(99.4%)。在随机接受标准手术的11例患者中,Seldinger方法是一种成功的抢救策略。结论:两种开放插入方法的主要成功率相似。如果标准开放插入失败,则修改后的Seldinger方法很有用。注册号:ISRCTN 52368201(http://www.control-trials.com)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号