首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Mobilisation with movement and exercise corticosteroid injection or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial
【2h】

Mobilisation with movement and exercise corticosteroid injection or wait and see for tennis elbow: randomised trial

机译:通过运动和锻炼动员注射皮质类固醇激素或网球肘静观一下:随机试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To investigate the efficacy of physiotherapy compared with a wait and see approach or corticosteroid injections over 52 weeks in tennis elbow.>Design Single blind randomised controlled trial.>Setting Community setting, Brisbane, Australia.>Participants 198 participants aged 18 to 65 years with a clinical diagnosis of tennis elbow of a minimum six weeks' duration, who had not received any other active treatment by a health practitioner in the previous six months.>Interventions Eight sessions of physiotherapy; corticosteroid injections; or wait and see.>Main outcome measures Global improvement, grip force, and assessor's rating of severity measured at baseline, six weeks, and 52 weeks.>Results Corticosteroid injection showed significantly better effects at six weeks but with high recurrence rates thereafter (47/65 of successes subsequently regressed) and significantly poorer outcomes in the long term compared with physiotherapy. Physiotherapy was superior to wait and see in the short term; no difference was seen at 52 weeks, when most participants in both groups reported a successful outcome. Participants who had physiotherapy sought less additional treatment, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, than did participants who had wait and see or injections.>Conclusion Physiotherapy combining elbow manipulation and exercise has a superior benefit to wait and see in the first six weeks and to corticosteroid injections after six weeks, providing a reasonable alternative to injections in the mid to long term. The significant short term benefits of corticosteroid injection are paradoxically reversed after six weeks, with high recurrence rates, implying that this treatment should be used with caution in the management of tennis elbow.
机译:>目的:比较52周内网球肘中的物理疗法与观望法或皮质类固醇激素注射的疗效。>设计单盲随机对照试验。>设置< / strong>社区设置,澳大利亚布里斯班。>参与者年龄在18至65岁之间的198名参与者的临床诊断为网球肘的持续时间至少为六个星期,他们没有接受任何其他主动治疗>干预八次物理治疗;皮质类固醇注射;或等待观察。>主要结果指标:在基线,六周和52周时测得的总体改善,抓地力和评估者的严重性等级。>结果皮质类固醇注射剂显示明显好转与物理治疗相比,在六周时效果显着,但此后复发率较高(成功的成功率下降了47/65),从长期来看,其结局明显较差。在短期内,物理治疗优于等待观察;当两组的大多数参与者都报告了成功的结果时,在52周时没有发现差异。进行物理治疗的参与者寻求的其他治疗(例如非甾体抗炎药)要比等待观察或注射的参与者少。>结论结合肘部肘部锻炼和运动的物理治疗具有更好的等待优势并在头六周内注射,并在六周后注射皮质类固醇,为中长期注射提供了合理的替代方案。皮质类固醇注射剂的显着短期益处在六周后被矛盾地逆转,复发率很高,这意味着在网球肘的治疗中应谨慎使用该疗法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号