...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Exercise and load modification versus corticosteroid injection versus ‘wait and see’ for persistent gluteus medius/minimus tendinopathy (the LEAP trial): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial
【24h】

Exercise and load modification versus corticosteroid injection versus ‘wait and see’ for persistent gluteus medius/minimus tendinopathy (the LEAP trial): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial

机译:运动和负荷调整与皮质类固醇激素注射与持久性臀肌/小肌腱病的“观望”(LEAP试验):一项随机临床试验方案

获取原文

摘要

Background Lateral hip pain is common, particularly in females aged 40–60 years. The pain can affect sleep and daily activities, and is frequently recalcitrant. The condition is often diagnosed as trochanteric bursitis, however radiological and surgical studies have revealed that the most common pathology is gluteus medius/minimus tendinopathy. Patients are usually offered three treatment options: (a) corticosteroid injection (CSI), (b) physiotherapy, or (c) reassurance and observation. Research on Achilles and patellar tendons has shown that load modification and exercise appears to be more effective than other treatments for managing tendinopathy, however, it is unclear whether a CSI, or a load modification and exercise-based physiotherapy approach is more effective in gluteal tendinopathy. This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy on pain and function of a load modification and exercise-based programme with a CSI and a ‘wait and see’ approach for gluteal tendinopathy. Methods Two hundred one people with gluteal tendinopathy will be randomly allocated into one of three groups: (i) CSI; (ii) physiotherapist-administered load modification and exercise intervention; and (iii) wait and see approach. The CSI therapy will consist of one ultrasound (US) guided CSI around the affected tendons and advice on tendon care. Education about load modification will be delivered in physiotherapy clinics and the exercise programme will be both home-based and supervised. The group allocated the wait and see approach will receive basic tendon care advice and reassurance in a single session by a trial physiotherapist. Outcomes will be evaluated at baseline, 4, 8, 12, 26 and 52?weeks using validated global rating of change, pain and physical function scales, psychological measures, quality of life and physical activity levels. Hip abductor muscle strength will be measured at baseline and 8?weeks. Economic evaluation will be performed to investigate the cost-effectiveness of the active interventions compared with the wait and see approach. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis using logistic and linear mixed regression models and the economic evaluation will report incremental cost-utility ratios. The trial reporting will comply with CONSORT guidelines. Discussion This study will provide clinicians with directly applicable evidence of the relative efficacy of three common approaches to the management of gluteal tendinopathy. Trial registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12612001126?808 . Date Registered: 22/10/2012.
机译:背景髋部外侧疼痛很常见,尤其是在40-60岁的女性中。疼痛会影响睡眠和日常活动,并且经常变得顽强。该病通常被诊断为股骨转子滑囊炎,但是放射学和外科研究表明,最常见的病理是中臀肌/小肌腱病。通常为患者提供三种治疗选择:(a)皮质类固醇注射液(CSI),(b)理疗或(c)保证和观察。对跟腱和pa骨肌腱的研究表明,负荷改变和锻炼似乎比其他治疗肌腱病的方法更有效,但是,尚不清楚CSI,负荷改变和基于锻炼的理疗方法在臀肌腱病中是否更有效。这项随机对照试验旨在比较负荷修正和基于运动的程序与CSI和“观望法”对臀肌腱病的疼痛和功能功效。方法将211名臀肌腱病患者随机分为三组:(i)CSI; (ii)物理治疗师管理的负荷调整和运动干预; (iii)静观其变。 CSI治疗将包括在受累肌腱周围进行的一次超声(美国)引导CSI和有关肌腱护理的建议。有关负荷修改的教育将在理疗诊所进行,并且锻炼计划将以家庭为基础并接受监督。分配了观望方式的小组将在一个疗程中接受物理理疗师的基本肌腱护理建议和保证。在基线,第4、8、12、26和52周时,将使用经过验证的总体变化,疼痛和身体功能量表,心理测评,生活质量和身体活动水平对结果进行评估。髋外展肌的力量将在基线和8周时测量。与等待观察方法相比,将进行经济评估以调查积极干预措施的成本效益。将使用对数和线性混合回归模型在意向性处理基础上进行分析,经济评估将报告增量的成本-效用比率。试验报告将符合CONSORT指南。讨论本研究将为临床医生提供三种常见方法治疗臀肌腱病的相对疗效的直接适用证据。试验注册澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12612001126?808。注册日期:22/10/2012。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号