首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Urology >A pilot study to assess the safety and usefulness of combined transurethral endoscopic mucosal resection and en-bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
【2h】

A pilot study to assess the safety and usefulness of combined transurethral endoscopic mucosal resection and en-bloc resection for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

机译:评估非尿道浸润性膀胱癌经尿道内镜黏膜切除和全切除联合治疗的安全性和有效性的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundTransurethral resection (TUR) is the standard operation used for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Although most solid tumors are principally removed via single block resection without incising the mass, disruption of the lesion is unavoidable in traditional TUR. Furthermore, pathological diagnosis is often difficult due to heat-related denaturation of tissues in TUR. Although transurethral en-bloc resection is useful for judging tumor invasion, it is associated with a prolonged operative duration. We attempted to show the safety and usefulness of combined endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and en-bloc resection in NMIBC patients.
机译:背景技术经尿道切除术(TUR)是用于非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)的标准手术。尽管大多数实体瘤原则上是通过单节切除术切除而不增加肿块,但传统的TUR不可避免地破坏了病变。此外,由于TUR中组织的热相关变性,病理诊断通常很困难。尽管经尿道大块切除术可用于判断肿瘤的侵袭,但它与手术时间延长有关。我们试图证明NMIBC患者联合内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)和大块切除术的安全性和有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号