首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BioMed Research International >Quantitative Assessment of Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy and Variability from Visual Auscultation Method by Observers without Receiving Medical Training
【2h】

Quantitative Assessment of Blood Pressure Measurement Accuracy and Variability from Visual Auscultation Method by Observers without Receiving Medical Training

机译:未接受医学培训的观察者通过视觉听诊法对血压测量准确性和变异性的定量评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to quantify blood pressure (BP) measurement accuracy and variability with different techniques. Thirty video clips of BP recordings from the BHS training database were converted to Korotkoff sound waveforms. Ten observers without receiving medical training were asked to determine BPs using (a) traditional manual auscultatory method and (b) visual auscultation method by visualizing the Korotkoff sound waveform, which was repeated three times on different days. The measurement error was calculated against the reference answers, and the measurement variability was calculated from the SD of the three repeats. Statistical analysis showed that, in comparison with the auscultatory method, visual method significantly reduced overall variability from 2.2 to 1.1 mmHg for SBP and from 1.9 to 0.9 mmHg for DBP (both p < 0.001). It also showed that BP measurement errors were significant for both techniques (all p < 0.01, except DBP from the traditional method). Although significant, the overall mean errors were small (−1.5 and −1.2 mmHg for SBP and −0.7 and 2.6 mmHg for DBP, resp., from the traditional auscultatory and visual auscultation methods). In conclusion, the visual auscultation method had the ability to achieve an acceptable degree of BP measurement accuracy, with smaller variability in comparison with the traditional auscultatory method.
机译:这项研究旨在量化不同技术对血压(BP)测量的准确性和变异性。来自BHS培训数据库的BP录音的30个视频剪辑被转换为Korotkoff声音波形。要求10名未接受医学培训的观察者使用以下方法确定血压:(a)传统手动听诊法和(b)视觉听诊法,通过可视化Korotkoff声音波形,在不同的日期重复3次。根据参考答案计算测量误差,并根据三个重复的SD计算测量变异性。统计分析表明,与听诊法相比,视觉法将SBP的总体变异性从2.2降低至1.1µmmHg,而DBP的变异性从1.9降低至0.9µmmHg(均p <0.001)。它还表明,对于这两种技术,BP测量误差均很显着(除传统方法的DBP外,所有p均<0.01)。尽管很明显,但总体平均误差很小(SBP的平均值为-1.5和-1.2 mmHg,DBP的平均值为-0.7和2.6 mmHg,分别来自传统的听诊和视觉听诊方法)。总之,与传统的听诊法相比,视觉听诊法能够达到可接受的血压测量精度,并且变异性较小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号