首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Archives of Emergency Medicine >Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute undifferentiated chest pain
【2h】

Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute undifferentiated chest pain

机译:急性未分化胸痛患者诊断策略的成本效益

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objectives: Patients presenting to hospital with acute, undifferentiated chest pain have a low, but important, risk of significant myocardial ischaemia. Potential diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain vary from low cost, poor effectiveness (discharging all home) to high cost, high effectiveness (admission and intensive investigation). This paper aimed to estimate the relative cost effectiveness of these strategies. >Methods: Decision analysis modelling was used to measure the incremental cost per quality adjusted year of life (QALY) gained for five potential strategies to diagnose acute undifferentiated chest pain, compared with the next most effective strategy, or a baseline strategy of discharging all patients home without further testing. >Results: Cardiac enzyme testing alone costs £17 432/QALY compared with discharge without testing. Adding two to six hours of observation and repeat enzyme testing costs an additional £18 567/QALY. Adding exercise testing to this strategy costs £28 553/QALY. A strategy of overnight admission, enzyme, and exercise testing has an incremental cost of £120 369/QALY, while a strategy consisting of overnight admission without exercise testing is subject to extended dominance. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the results are sensitive to variations in the direct costs of running each strategy and to variation in assumptions regarding the effect of diagnostic testing upon quality of life of those with non-cardiac disease. >Conclusion: Observation based strategies incur similar costs per QALY to presently funded interventions for coronary heart disease, while strategies requiring hospital admission may be prohibitively poor value for money. Validation of the true costs and effects of observation based strategies is essential before widespread implementation.
机译:>目标:住院时出现急性,未分化胸痛的患者发生严重心肌缺血的风险较低,但很重要。急性,未分化胸痛患者的潜在诊断策略从低成本,低效(全家出院)到高成本,高效率(入院和深入研究)不等。本文旨在估计这些策略的相对成本效益。 >方法:与下一个最有效的策略相比,使用决策分析模型来衡量每五个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本,这五个潜在策略可用于诊断急性未分化胸痛。无需进一步测试即可将所有患者送回家的基本策略。 >结果:与未经测试的出院相比,仅进行心脏酶测试的费用为17432英镑/ QALY。再加上两到六个小时的观察和重复酶测,每QALY需额外花费18567英镑。将锻炼测试添加到该策略中的费用为£28 553 / QALY。过夜入院,酶和运动测试的策略的成本增加120 369英镑/ QALY,而包括夜间入场但不进行运动测试的策略则可能会占主导地位。敏感性分析表明,结果对每种策略的直接成本变化以及诊断测试对非心脏病患者的生活质量影响的假设变化敏感。 >结论:基于观察的策略每QALY所产生的费用与目前资助的冠心病干预措施相似,而需要入院的策略可能物超所值。在广泛实施之前,验证基于观测的策略的真实成本和效果至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号