首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>APA Open Access >Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
【2h】

Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall

机译:错误和正确的召回不是同一枚硬币的两个方面:自由召回中的语义分散证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two experiments examined the extent to which erroneous recall blocks veridical recall using, as a vehicle for study, the disruptive impact of distractors that are semantically similar to a list of words presented for free recall. Instructing participants to avoid erroneous recall of to-be-ignored spoken distractors attenuated their recall but this did not influence the disruptive effect of those distractors on veridical recall (Experiment 1). Using an externalized output-editing procedure—whereby participants recalled all items that came to mind and identified those that were erroneous—the usual between-sequences semantic similarity effect on erroneous and veridical recall was replicated but the relationship between the rate of erroneous and veridical recall was weak (Experiment 2). The results suggest that forgetting is not due to veridical recall being blocked by similar events.
机译:两项实验研究了错误召回在多大程度上阻止了垂直召回,使用了干扰因素的破坏性影响作为研究手段,这些干扰因素在语义上类似于为自由召回而提出的一系列单词。指示参与者避免错误地召回那些会被忽略的语音干扰者,这会降低他们的召回率,但这不会影响那些干扰因素对垂直召回的破坏性影响(实验1)。使用外部化的输出编辑程序-参与者可以回忆起想到的所有项目并识别出错误的项目-复制了通常的序列间语义相似性对错误和垂直召回的影响,但是错误和垂直召回率之间的关系较弱(实验2)。结果表明,遗忘不是由于类似事件阻止了垂直回忆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号