...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition >Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall
【24h】

Erroneous and Veridical Recall Are Not Two Sides of the Same Coin: Evidence From Semantic Distraction in Free Recall

机译:错误和正确的召回不是同一枚硬币的两个方面:自由召回中的语义分散证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Two experiments examined the extent to which erroneous recall blocks veridical recall using, as a vehicle for study, the disruptive impact of distractors that are semantically similar to a list of words presented for free recall. Instructing participants to avoid erroneous recall of to-be-ignored spoken distractors attenuated their recall but this did not influence the disruptive effect of those distractors on veridical recall (Experiment 1). Using an externalized output editing procedure whereby participants recalled all items that came to mind and identified those that were erroneous the usual between sequences semantic similarity effect on erroneous and veridical recall was replicated hut the relationship between the rate of erroneous and veridical recall was weak (Experiment 2). The results suggest that forgetting is not due to veridical recall being blocked by similar events.
机译:两项实验检查了错误召回在多大程度上阻止了垂直召回,并使用干扰素的破坏性影响作为研究工具,这些干扰在语义上类似于为自由召回而提出的一系列单词。指示参与者避免错误地召回那些会被忽略的语音干扰物,这会降低他们的记忆力,但这不会影响那些干扰物对垂直记忆力的破坏作用(实验1)。使用外部化的输出编辑程序,参与者可以回忆起所有想到的内容,并识别出序列之间常见的错误内容,从而复制了语义相似性对错误和垂直回忆的影响,但错误和垂直回忆率之间的关系很弱(实验2)。结果表明,遗忘不是由于类似事件阻止了垂直回忆。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号