首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >A Systematic Review of Community Engagement in the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Extramural Research Solicitations: Implications for Research Funders
【2h】

A Systematic Review of Community Engagement in the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Extramural Research Solicitations: Implications for Research Funders

机译:对美国环境保护局的壁外研究请求中社区参与的系统评价:对研究资助者的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives. We systematically reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Research’s (NCER’s) requests for applications (RFAs) and identified strategies that NCER and other funders can take to bolster community engagement.Methods. We queried NCER’s publically available online archive of funding opportunities from fiscal years 1997 to 2013. From an initial list of 211 RFAs that met our inclusion criteria, 33 discussed or incorporated elements of community engagement. We examined these RFAs along 6 dimensions and the degree of alignments between them.Results. We found changes over time in the number of RFAs that included community engagement, variations in how community engagement is defined and expected, inconsistencies between application requirements and peer review criteria, and the inclusion of mechanisms supporting community engagement in research.Conclusions. The results inform a systematic approach to developing RFAs that support community engagement in research.
机译:目标。我们系统地审查了环境保护署,国家环境研究中心(NCER)的申请请求(RFA),并确定了NCER和其他资助者可以采取的促进社区参与的策略。我们查询了NCER从1997财政年度到2013财政年度公开可用的在线融资机会档案。从最初的211个RFA列表(符合我们的纳入标准)开始,其中33个讨论或纳入了社区参与元素。我们沿6个维度以及它们之间的对齐程度检查了这些RFA。结果。我们发现随时间推移的RFA数量发生了变化,包括社区参与,社区参与的定义和预期方式存在差异,申请要求与同行评审标准之间的不一致以及支持社区参与研究的机制。结果为开发RFA提供了系统的方法,以支持社区参与研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号