首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Why Health Care Process Performance Measures Can Have Different Relationships to Outcomes for Patients and Hospitals: Understanding the Ecological Fallacy
【2h】

Why Health Care Process Performance Measures Can Have Different Relationships to Outcomes for Patients and Hospitals: Understanding the Ecological Fallacy

机译:为什么卫生保健过程绩效衡量指标可以与患者和医院的结果产生不同的关系:了解生态谬误

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Relationships between health care process performance measures (PPMs) and outcomes can differ in magnitude and even direction for patients versus higher level units (e.g., health care facilities). Such discrepancies can arise because facility-level relationships ignore PPM–outcome relationships for patients within facilities, may have different confounders than patient-level PPM–outcome relationships, and may reflect facility effect modification of patient PPM–outcome relationships. If a patient-level PPM is related to better patient outcomes, that care process should be encouraged. However, the finding in a multilevel analysis that the proportion of patients receiving PPM care across facilities nevertheless is linked to poor hospital outcomes would suggest that interventions targeting the health care facility also are needed.
机译:相对于较高级别的单位(例如,卫生保健机构),卫生保健过程绩效度量(PPM)与结果之间的关系在大小和方向上可能会有所不同。之所以会出现这种差异,是因为设施级别的关系忽略了设施内患者的PPM-结果关系,可能与患者水平的PPM-结果关系存在不同的混杂因素,并且可能反映了对患者PPM-结果关系的设施效果修改。如果患者水平的PPM与更好的患者预后相关,则应鼓励该护理过程。但是,在多层次分析中发现,尽管在各个机构中接受PPM护理的患者比例仍与医院的不良结局有关,这表明还需要针对医疗机构的干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号