首页> 外文期刊>BMJ quality & safety >Mortality, readmission and length of stay have different relationships using hospital-level versus patient-level data: an example of the ecological fallacy affecting hospital performance indicators
【24h】

Mortality, readmission and length of stay have different relationships using hospital-level versus patient-level data: an example of the ecological fallacy affecting hospital performance indicators

机译:死亡率,再入院和逗留时间使用医院级与患者级数据具有不同的关系:影响医院绩效指标的生态谬误的示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Ecological fallacy refers to an erroneous inference about individuals on the basis of findings for the group to which those individuals belong. Suppose analysis of a large database shows that hospitals with a high proportion of long length of stay (LOS) patients also have higher than average in-hospital mortality. This may prompt efforts to reduce mortality among patients with long LOS. But patients with long LOS may not be the ones at higher risk of death. It may be that hospitals with higher mortality (regardless of LOS) also have more long LOS patients-either because of quality problems on both counts or because of unaccounted differences in case mix. To provide more insight how the ecological fallacy influences the evaluation of hospital performance indicators, we assessed whether hospital-level associations between in-hospital mortality, readmission and long LOS reflect patient-level associations.
机译:背景技术生态谬误是指基于这些个人所属的集团的调查结果的错误推理。 假设对大型数据库的分析表明,长度长度长度(LOS)患者的医院也具有高于住院内部死亡率。 这可能会迅速努力减少长洛杉矶患者的死亡率。 但是长期洛杉矶的患者可能不是较高死亡风险的患者。 可能是具有更高死亡率的医院(无论洛杉矶)还具有更多的洛杉矶患者,因为两者都有质量问题,或因为在案例混合的情况下差异不足。 为了提供更多洞察力,生态谬误如何影响医院绩效指标的评估,我们评估了医院内部死亡率,再入院和长期洛杉矶反映患者级协会之间的医院级联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号