首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Pathology >Demonstration of inflammatory mediator-induced inflammation and endothelial cell damage in the anterior segment of the eye.
【2h】

Demonstration of inflammatory mediator-induced inflammation and endothelial cell damage in the anterior segment of the eye.

机译:在眼前段证实炎症介质诱导的炎症和内皮细胞损伤。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although some investigations have demonstrated the ability of inflammatory mediators, including vasopermeability and chemotactic factors, to induce acute inflammatory reactions in vivo, little is known about the response of various elements of the anterior segment to the direct effects of inflammatory mediators. These studies were initiated to develop models for the investigation of inflammatory responses in this region of the eye. Acute inflammatory reactions were induced within the rabbit anterior chamber by intracameral injection of 50 microliters of various inflammatory mediators and were evaluated by clinical grade, leukocyte influx into the aqueous humor, and morphologic changes in the corneal endothelium. Peak responses were recorded following injection of 10(-4) M formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP); 5 ED50 C5fr; 0.5 mg/ml C5; undiluted anti-red blood cell (RBC) serum; and 10(-5) M histamine. The number of leukocytes per milliliter of aqueous humor induced by each mediator was quantitated by comparison with the number of leukocytes induced by buffer instillation into a separate group of rabbits (mediator-induced influx/buffer-induced influx). Comparisons were made 24 hours after instillation of mediators. The results of these studies were as follows: buffer alone, 1.0; fMLP, 3.1 C5fr, 61.0; C5, 8.7; anti-RBC, 91.0; and histamine, 24.0. Clinical grades correlated well with these ratios. In addition, differences were noted when the time kinetics of acute responses induced by two different mediators (10(-4) M fMLP, a synthetic preformed chemotactic factor; and a 1:5 dilution of anti-RBC, which binds to vascular and corneal endothelial cells) were directly compared over 48 hours. Responses induced with fMLP peaked between 5 and 8 hours and resolved rapidly, whereas anti-RBC-induced responses peaked between 8 and 12 hours and resolved very slowly. Histopathologic analysis indicated that both fMLP and anti-RBC induced a similar sequence of changes in the corneal endothelium. Within 2-3 hours after instillation of either mediator, the endothelial cells exhibited prominent vacuolization/retraction phenomena. At the peak of leukocyte influx PMNs filled these vacuoles, then migrated back into the aqueous humor within several hours. Normal morphologic features were recovered following clearance of leukocytes from the anterior chamber. We believe that these models will be useful in identifying the roles of individual mediators in acute and chronic endocular inflammation and in the injury of corneal endothelium.
机译:尽管一些研究表明炎症介质(包括血管通透性和趋化因子)在体内引起急性炎症反应的能力,但对于前节各元素对炎症介质直接作用的反应知之甚少。启动这些研究以开发用于研究该区域眼部炎症反应的模型。通过前房内注射50微升各种炎症介质在兔前房内诱发急性炎症反应,并通过临床等级,白细胞向房水的浸入以及角膜内皮的形态变化进行评估。注射10(-4)M甲酰基-甲硫酰基-亮氨酰-苯丙氨酸(fMLP)后,记录了峰响应。 5 ED50 C5fr; 0.5 mg / ml C5;未稀释的抗红细胞(RBC)血清;和10(-5)M组胺。通过与通过将缓冲液滴注到另一组兔子中而引起的白细胞数量进行比较,定量每种介体诱导的每毫升房水的白细胞数量(介导的流入量/缓冲液引起的流入量)。滴加介体后24小时进行比较。这些研究的结果如下:单独的缓冲液1.0; fMLP,3.1 C5fr,61.0; C5,8.7;抗RBC,91.0;和组胺24.0。临床等级与这些比率很好地相关。此外,当由两种不同的介体(10(-4)M fMLP,一种合成的预先形成的趋化因子;和1:5的抗RBC稀释物,与血管和角膜结合)诱导的急性反应的时间动力学差异时,注意到了差异。直接比较48小时内的内皮细胞)。用fMLP诱导的反应在5到8小时之间达到峰值,并迅速消退,而抗RBC诱导的反应在8到12小时之间达到峰值,并很缓慢地消退。组织病理学分析表明,fMLP和抗RBC均可诱导角膜内皮细胞发生相似的变化序列。在注入任何一种介体后的2-3小时内,内皮细胞均表现出明显的空泡化/收缩现象。在白细胞大量涌入时,PMN充满了这些液泡,然后在数小时内迁移回房水。从前房清除白细胞后,恢复了正常的形态学特征。我们认为,这些模型将有助于确定单个介质在急性和慢性眼内炎症以及在角膜内皮损伤中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号