为了防止诉讼突袭，追求公平、公正，最高人民法院于1998年、2002年先后两次以法律文件的形式确立了民事证据交换制度。该制度自建构以来，在抑制证据突袭、提高庭审效率、促进案件调解等方面起着重要作用。无疑，民事证据交换制度已经成为法庭审理前的核心制度。但是该制度自身规定空泛，亦无相关的法律予以确认，加之我国当前诉讼环境滞后，审前准备程序形同虚设，制约了该制度应有功能的发挥。笔者以司法实践为视角，结合相关的理论研究成果，对民事证据交换制度当前存在的问题进行剖析，并提出了具体的建构设想，以期该制度在司法实践中能够进一步发展完善。%In 1998 and 2002, the Supreme People's Court established civil evidence exchange system in the form of legal documents in order to prevent the lawsuit raid, and to pursue fairness and justice. Since the sys-tem was established, it has played an important role in the suppression of evidence attack, improving the effi-ciency of the trial and promoting mediation. Undoubtedly, the civil evidence exchange system has become the core of the system before the court. However, all of the following factors constrained the functions of the sys-tem, for example, the provisions of the system are vague, there is no relevant laws are recognized, the current litigation environment is lagging, and the pretrial procedures are dispensable. The author analyzed the current problems of the system of civil evidence exchange in the perspective of law practice, combined with the rele-vant theoretical research, and proposed the concrete presumptions of relevant countermeasures, in order to improve the system in judicial practice.
展开▼
