Vulnerabilities and Strengths of Democratic and Totalitarian Systems Confronted by Civilian-Based Defense.

摘要

Employment of military force in times of crisis is increasingly questionable. Therefore, other means of international suasion increase in importance. One form is civilian-based defense (CBD) which is lauded by proponents as 'tough' and 'pragmatic.' Democratic and totalitarian societies each have their strengths and weaknesses in dealing with it. Totalitarians may go so far as genocide against which nonviolent resistance is largely helpless. They are little bound traditional concepts of morality and humanity. Democratic states have more inhibitions. So, though CBD may be less fierce against them, it is far more likely to be effective. Totalitarians are also more practiced in regimentation. They are likely to interpret ostentatious preparations for CBD as signs of weakness and a virtual come-on. (Author)