研究从民法物权的角度出发分析了城市规划、地役权和“邻避”现象的关系,通过逻辑分析、案例分析和比较研究指出,“邻避”现象本质上属于维护财产权的物权行为,是自私自利的极端表现,严重威胁到城市规划的实施。同时,不动产产权的无限扩张受到地役权的制约,地役权是不动产产权内生的自我限制机制,与财产权构成辩证否定的关系,可以依法限制“邻避”行为。在此基础上,研究进一步指出了城市规划具有地役权属性,利用城市规划解决“邻避”现象的方法和机制,建立针对“邻避”的民法物权诉讼机制,对限制“邻避”现象将有所启发。%The paper analyzes the relation of urban planning, land servitude, and NIMBY (not in my backyard) phenomenon, points out NIMBY is essential y property right behavior and it severely threatens urban planning implementation. Meanwhile, property right is limited by land servitude, and they dialectical y deny each other and thus limit NIMBY. The paper points out urban planning has land servitude attribute, proposes methods of avoiding NIMBY, and sets up civil law and property law litigation mechanism.
展开▼