气管插管患者使用锥形和柱形套囊导管的气囊压力变化比较分析

摘要

Objective To investigate the pressure changes of cuff in the tapered-cuff endotracheal tubes and the frequency of cuff pressure monitoring in patient with trachea intubation. Methods From December 2016 to October 2017, 80 patients with oral tracheal intubation in the emergency department were divided into group A (n =25) and group B (n =23) according to the principle of randomized control. Group A with odd number was treated and tapered-cuff endotracheal tubes and group B with ever number and cylindrical-cuff endotracheal tubes. Continuous cuff pressure monitoring device was used to continuously monitor the cuff pressure. The two groups were compared in terms of time for keeping the normal cuff pressure and cuff pressure (average pressure, maximum pressure and minimum pressure). Results The total time for keeping the normal cuff pressure in group A was significantly shorter than that in group B (P＜0.05). The average cuff pressure in group A was smaller than that of group B (P＜0.05). The maximum pressure in group A is larger than that in group B and the maximum cuff pressure in group A was smaller than that of group B (P＜0.05). Conclusion Compared with the cylindrical cuff catheter, the tapered-cuff tube can maintain the normal pressure for a shorter period and easily produce needed pressure. It is a need to enhance the monitoring of cuff pressure to ensure good airway closure and reduce artificial airway complications.%目的 比较分析气管插管患者使用锥形和柱形套囊导管的气囊压力变化.方法 将2016年12月至2017年10月急诊科抢救区经口气管插管患者80例,按入院顺序进行编号,奇数组患者应用锥形套囊气管导管(以下简称锥形组),偶数组患者应用柱形套囊气管导管(以下简称柱形组).最终有48例患者纳入研究,其中锥形组25例,柱形组23例.比较两组患者维持正常气囊压力的总时间、气囊压力(平均压力值,压力最大值与压力最小值).结果 两组患者维持正常气囊压力的总时间、气囊压力(平均压力值,压力最大值与压力最小值)比较,差异具有统计学意义(均P＜0.05),其中锥形组患者气囊压力维持正常压力的总时间少于柱形组,气囊压力平均压力值小于柱形组,压力最大值大于柱形组患者,压力最小值小于柱形组.结论 与柱形套囊导管相比,锥形套囊导管气囊压力维持在正常范围的时间更短,锥形套囊导管更易产生较高或较低的气囊压力,需加强锥形套囊导管的气囊压力监测,以保证良好的气道封闭效果,减少人工气道并发症.