平片无张力疝修补术与疝环充填式修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效比较

摘要

Objective Researched and analyzed plain film tension-free hernioplasty and hernia ring filling repairation treated inguinal hernia’s clinical efficacy.Methods 2010-2012 in hospital had 90 patients with inguinal hernia,which were randomly divided into control group and treatment group.The control group treated with hernia ring filling repairation.The treatment group treated with plain film tension-free hernioplasty.Compared 2 groups with treatment effects,blood loss,operative time,length of stay,postoperative recovery condition,recurrence.Results After treatment,blood loss,operative time,length of stay,recurrence had no significant differences.It was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Observation group’s postoperative foreign body sensation,pain was significantly lower than in the control group.The difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);postoperative complications had no significant difference. It was not statistically significant (P>0.05).Conclusion 2 groups’treatment methods both had better clinical efficacy,but as foreign body sensation, pain,recurrent situation,the use of plain film tension-hernia hernioplasty was better than using t hernia ring filling repairation.It was worthy of clinical widely used.%目的：研究分析平片无张力疝修补术与疝环充填式修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效。方法选取本院2009年5月-2013年5月收治的腹股沟疝患者90例，随机分为对照组与治疗组，其中对照组进行疝环填充式修补术治疗，治疗组进行平片无张力疝修补术进行治疗，比较两组治疗效果，术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、患者术后恢复情况、复发情况。结果治疗后两组术中出血量、手术时间、住院时间、术后复发率之间差异不明显不具有统计学意义（P>0.05）；两组术后异物感、疼痛感观察组明显低于对照组，其差异明显具有统计学意义（P<0.05）；两组术后并发症差异不明显不具有统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论两组治疗方法均具有较好的临床疗效，但从术后患者异物感、异物感、复发情况来看，采用平片无张力疝修补术优于采用疝环充填式修补术，值得临床广泛应用。