Objective:To compare the efficacy of plain film tension-free hernia repair and hernia ring fill-ing hernia repair in inguinal hernia treatment.Methods:122 cases of inguinal hernia patients from August 2012 to June 2014 in a hospital were selected as the research objects and randomly divided into control group (flat piece without tension hernia repair)and observation group (hernia ring filling type hernia repair),61 cases in each group.Then compared the curative effect of two groups of patients and the incidence of postop-erative complication.Results:Two groups of patients in the operation time,blood loss,pain time had no sta-tistical significance (P >0.05),but the observation group in the length of hospital stay and medical charge were significantly better than that of control group,which had statistical significance(P <0.05 ).The inci-dence of postoperative complications of control group was 14.8%,which compared with the incidence of postoperative complications(4.9%)of control group had significant statistical difference (P <0.05).Conclu-sion:Both plain film tension repair and hernia ring filling type hernia repair have good curative effect in the treatment of inguinal hernia ,but the former treatment has advantages of low incidence of postoperative com-plications,shorter hospitalization time,and lower medical expenses,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.%目的：：观察并分析平片无张力及疝环充填式两种疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法：选取于某院进行腹股沟疝治疗的122例患者为研究对象，随机分为对照组(平片无张力疝修补术)和观察组(疝环填充式疝修补术)，每组各61例。对两组患者的疗效及术后并发症发生率进行比较。结果：两组患者在手术时间、出血量、疼痛时间上比较无统计学意义(P >0.05)，但观察组在住院时间及医疗费用上显著优于对照组，统计学差异明显(P <0.05)。对照组术后并发症发生率为14.8%，与观察组的4.9%相比，具有显著的统计学差异(P <0.05)。结论：平片无张力修补术及疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝均有较好的疗效，但前者术后并发症发生率低，住院时间短、医疗费用低，临床值得推广运用。
展开▼
