高频探头与低频探头诊断阑尾炎的临床应用分析

摘要

Objective:To study and compare the clinical application of high-frequency and low-frequency probe for the diagnosis of appendicitis. Method:The ultrasound results of 80 cases in our hospital with appendicitis confirmed by pathology were reviewed and analyzed.The different frequency of the probe of appendicitis diagnosis coincidence rate were compared.Result:Seventy-five cases were diagnosed by high-frequency probe,the diagnosis rate was 93.75%.44 cases were diagnosed by low-frequency probe,the diagnosis rate was 55.0%.80 cases were diagnosed by high-frequency combined with low-frequency probe,the diagnosis rate was 100%.The diagnosis rate of high-frequency probe was significantly higher than that in low-frequency probe,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).The diagnosis rate of combination was the highest.Conclusion:For the diagnosis of appendicitis,diagnosis rate of high-frequency probe is significantly higher than low-frequency probe.The combination can improve the diagnosis rate.%目的：研究比较高频探头与低频探头用于阑尾炎的诊断价值。方法：回顾性分析本院80例经术后病理检查证实的阑尾炎患者的临床资料，对其超声结果进行分析，对比不同频率的探头对阑尾炎的诊断符合率。结果：80例患者中，应用高频探头诊断例数75例，诊断符合率93.75%，应用低频探头诊断例数44例，诊断符合率55.0%，高、低频探头联合诊断例数80例，诊断符合率100%。高频探头诊断符合率明显高于低频探头，比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），高、低频探头联合诊断符合率最高。结论：对于阑尾炎的诊断，高频探头超声的诊断符合率明显高于低频探头超声，但二者各有所长，联合应用能有效提高诊断符合率。