首页> 中文期刊>徐州医学院学报 >乳腺癌术后不同放疗技术的剂量学评价

乳腺癌术后不同放疗技术的剂量学评价

     

摘要

Objective To evaluate the dosimetric characteristics of intensity -modulated radiation therapy ( IMRT) and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D -CRT) after breast -conserving surgery or radical mastectomy . Methods Twenty breast cancer patients were enrolled into the current study , including ten receiving breast -conserving surgery before randomly divided into groups A and B , and ten who were given radical mastectomy before randomly divided into groups C and D .Each group has five persons .Patients in groups A and C were treated with IMRT , while those in groups B and D with 3D-CRT.Then, they were subject to dosimetric assessment .Results Patients receiving IMRT presented higher homogeneity index ( HI) and conformity index ( CI) values for planning target volume ( PTV) than those using 3D-CRT.Moreover, after IMRT the radical group showed reduced lung volumes at the presence of 5 Gy and 10 Gy of radiation (V5 and V10), decreases in the mean dose (Dmean) and the minimal dose (D min) at the rib of the af-fected side, and increases in the maximal dos ( Dmax) in the breast of the normal side , when compared with the conser-vative group.However, when 3D-CRT was applied, no statistical difference was seen between these patients as to the measurement above .Also, patients with IMRT produced significantly smaller volumes of each organ at low doses , but bigger volumes at high doses than those using 3D-CRT (P<0.05).Conclusion Both IMRT and 3D-CRT can be applied for breast cancer treatment , where targeted areas are well covered .However , patients receiving IMRT may yield better HI and CI values, in comparison with those with 3D-CRT.Furthermore, IMRT can efficiently reduce the exposed volume at high doses , while 3D-CRT can control well the exposed volume of normal tissues at low doses .These findings indicate that IMRT is more beneficial for breast cancer patients .%目的:评价乳腺癌保乳术及根治术后调强放疗(IMRT)与适形放疗(3D-CRT)的剂量学特点。方法选取乳腺癌患者20例作为研究对象,其中保乳术患者10例,随机分为A、B两组,每组5例,根治术患者10例,随机分为C、D两组,每组5例。 A、C组均采用IMRT,B、D组均采用3D-CRT,分别比较4组患者的放射剂量学差异及优劣。结果①无论是保乳术后还是根治术后采用IMRT技术,计划靶区( PTV)的HI、CI值均优于3D-CRT;②IMRT技术下,根治组双肺V5、V10、Dmean以及患侧肋骨Dmin低于保乳组,健侧乳腺Dmax大于保乳组;③应用3D-CRT技术,2组患者参数无统计学意义;④IMRT组患者各器官低剂量体积大于3D-CRT组,而高剂量体积小于3D-CRT组。以上差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论乳腺癌术后行IMRT及3D-CRT均能较好地覆盖靶区,但IMRT的剂量均匀性、靶区适形度优于3D-CRT,3D-CRT对正常组织的等低剂量照射体积控制较好,而IMRT可以有效降低高剂量照射体积,均匀性更好。仅仅从计划参数上比较,乳腺癌术后调强放疗获益更大。

著录项

  • 来源
    《徐州医学院学报》|2015年第2期|116-121|共6页
  • 作者单位

    徐州市肿瘤医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221005;

    徐州医学院附属医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221002;

    徐州市肿瘤医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221005;

    徐州市肿瘤医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221005;

    徐州市肿瘤医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221005;

    徐州市肿瘤医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221005;

    徐州医学院附属医院放疗科;

    江苏 徐州 221002;

  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 chi
  • 中图分类 乳腺肿瘤;
  • 关键词

    适形放疗; 调强放疗; 剂量学;

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号