论王船山以丹法释骚的合理性

摘要

人们认为，王船山《通释》以丹法释骚，有用后起之学释前贤作品、以道家学术解儒者著作之嫌，故失之偏颇。事实上，内丹学的标志性著作虽出自道家，但内丹丹法却源自先秦养生内炼术，在楚辞创作年代已基本成型；且屈原并非纯粹的儒家学者，在他的思想中诸学并存、儒道兼容。因此，王船山以丹法释骚有其合理性，我们不能顺着以儒释骚的传统惯性，断言其为谬误。%　　People believed the Taoism——Chuanshan’s The explanation of Songs of Chu used to explain Li Sao has suspicion which was explained by later theories of the rise of predecessor's works and explained by Taoism Confucianism's works,it is biased. In fact,although the iconic works of Inner Alchemy derived from Taoism,but the internal Dan method originated from the healthy practice of the internal body in pre-Qin China which has basically taken shape in era Songs of Chu creation;and Qu Yuan was not purely Confucian scholars,coexistence of all learn in his thoughts,Confucianism,Taoism and compatible. Therefore,Wang Chuanshan used the Taoism to explain Li Sao shows their legitimacy,we cannot follow the traditional inertia of Confucianism in Li Sao asserts that it is a fallacy.