首页> 中文期刊>太原理工大学学报(社会科学版) >'自然法'与'道法自然'之概念比较分析

'自然法'与'道法自然'之概念比较分析

     

摘要

In 1904, in his book The Rich History of Chinese Jurisprudence, LIANG Qichao claimed the theories of Confucian jurisprudence belonged to natural law, his conclusion aroused great repercussions in academic world. Since then, the view that natural law exists in the legal and cultural traditions of China has been popular. In the course of the development of China's jurisprudence, there exist many kinds of identical or different writings on this issue, but they ignored the in-depth study of relevant concepts. And identifying the connotations of the relevant concepts, especially the two most important ones, namely, " Natural Law" and "Tao Follows Nature", is precisely important prerequisites for studying this issue.%1904年,梁启超在其所著的《中国法理学发达史论》中认为儒家的法理学理论是自然法,该结论在学术界引起了极大的反响;从此以后,中国法律文化传统中存在自然法的观点便开始盛行.在中国法学发展的过程中,关于该问题求同证异的著述虽层出不穷,但是却忽略了对相关概念的深入研究;而明确相关的概念内涵,尤其是其中最为重要的两个概念即"自然法"和"道法自然",恰恰是研究这一问题的重要前提.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号