《国有土地上房屋征收与补偿条例》第二十五条对所涉补偿协议纠纷，采取何种诉讼予以救济不置可否，极易导致法院受理案件与民众维护权益时无所适从，因而，应辨明征收补偿协议的性质。从基本法理分析得知，征收补偿协议契合行政契约的内在逻辑，并且，当前“民事契约论”的形成多囿于补偿协议的契约性而径直定性，抑或受制于现有制度框架造成的惯性思维。而把征收补偿协议定位为行政契约，既可以使征收补偿协议得到理性回归，推进行政契约理论在行政活动中获得本真拓展，又可以更好地保护行政相对人的合法权益。%The article 25 of Collection of State-owned Land, Housing and Compensation Ordinance does not state what action to take to remedy when disputes happen, which fails to enable neither the court to accept a case nor the public to maintain rights and interests. Therefore, the nature of the compensation agreement should be identified. Compensation agreement is inherent with the logic of administrative con-tract. The formation of the civil contract view is either constrained by the contractual nature of compensa-tion agreement or limited by the inertial thinking caused by the existing institutional framework. Locating the compensation agreement as administrative contract not only enables its rational return, but also pro-motes natural development of the administrative contract theory in the administrative activities. Moreover, it is of practical significance for the protection the legitimate rights and interests for the administrative counterpart.
展开▼
