重庆谈判期间《大公报》的立场矛盾与时局关系

摘要

《大公报》这份民办报纸自办报伊始素来以坚持爱国为公、民族正义占有一席之地。在对重庆谈判这一重大历史事件的关注与报导上，《大公报》重庆版却显现出显有的立场矛盾。针对这一事件，国共两党机关报均从各自立场出发，进行舆论宣传。然而，《大公报》却表现出特殊的立场---既大呼盼和平、免内战，又鲜明地站在拥蒋立场。这一特征既是中国文人传统的反映，也是重庆谈判时局下其“国家中心论”情结，国民党的间接压制以及中国共产党与其接触不足等综合影响的结果。%“Ta Kung Pao”, the private newspaper, took its space because of insisting on the patriotism and national justice since the beginning of the newspaper In the attention of this major historical event and report on the“Chongqing negotiations”,“Ta Kung Pao”, version of Chongqing, revealed a significant position of contradiction. According to this event, the organ of the KMT and the CPC carried out public opinion propaganda starting from their respective positions.However,“Ta Kung Pao”showed a particular position:both for peace, no civil war , and clear-ly standing on the spot of supporting Jiang Jieshi.This feature was not only a reflection of the Chinese literati tradi-tion, but also a complex of“state-centered theory” under the situation of Chongqing negotiations, and the compre-hensive effect of the KMT's indirect suppression and the CPC's lack of contact.