首页> 中文期刊>南京师大学报(社会科学版) >政策过程视角下“一村(居)一律师”制度的困境与出路--以广东省M市为例

政策过程视角下“一村(居)一律师”制度的困境与出路--以广东省M市为例

     

摘要

在信访成为当前民众维权常见手段的背景下,广东省M市在全省首推“一村(居)一律师”制度,但受到政府的宣传不力,村委会的执行偏差,驻村律师的消极怠惰,群众的惯性行为、评估监督的不完善以及反馈机制的缺失等现实阻碍,使得其实际效用得不到充分发挥,群众上访洪峰仍旧存在。“徒法不足以自行”,一个好的政策不能止步于政策的制定,它是由政策的执行、评估、监控与反馈等前后相连组成的一个连续过程,在这个连续过程中,每一部分都发挥着特殊的功能。“一村(居)一律师”政策的目标要通过政策执行主体的行为来实现,要落实到人的行为上。同时,还要通过强有力的监督、完善的评估体系以及有效的反馈得以实现。%Nowadays, people often make public complaints in the form of letters and visits to relevant governmental bodies to safeguard their legal rights. In this context, the M city, initiated the one-law-yer-one-village system in Guangdong province, requiring every village to be equipped with a lawyer to offer legal aid. However, the system has not been brought into full play due to the practical challenges as follows:poor promotion from the government, weak performance of the village committees, inaction of the lawyers, inertial behaviors of the masses, insufficient supervision, and lack of effective assess-ment and feedback systems. Thus, there are still a lot of public complaints filed through letters and visits. A saying goes like this:laws alone cannot carry themselves into practice. Only when a policy is linked with a whole process of execution, assessment, supervision and feedback can it achieve its pur-poses. During this process, every part plays a critical role. The objectives of one-village-one-lawyer policy should be achieved by its enforcement bodies, as well as effective supervision, a workable as-sessment system and prompt feedback.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号