单切口与传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机对比研究

摘要

Objective: To compare the short-term outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) versus conventional 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy ( LC). Methods:Between Jun. and Aug. 2011,40 qualified patients with gallstone or gallbladder polyps were selected and randomly assigned to SILC (n =20) and LC (ra =20) groups. General data,operative time,blood loss,hospital stay, incision length, pain score, complications and C-reactive protein (CRP) were compared between SILC and LC groups. Results;No significant difference was detected between two groups in age,gender, ASA,body mass index and CRP before surgery. Operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, complications and postoperative CRP were similar ( P > 0.05 ). Incision of SILC was shorter and the pain score was lower. Conclusions; SILC is feasible and safe for selected patients. The advantages of SILC are less wound and lower pain scores.%目的:对比分析单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy,SILC)与传统四孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的近期疗效.方法:2011年6月至8月将40例胆囊结石和胆囊息肉患者随机分为SILC组(n=20)和LC组(n=20).对比分析两组患者一般资料、手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症、切口长度、疼痛程度和C反应蛋白量( C-reactive protein,CRP).结果:两组患者年龄、性别、ASA分期、体重指数和术前CRP无明显差别,手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、并发症、术后CRP差异无统计学意义,但SILC组切口更小,术后疼痛更轻微.结论:适当把握手术适应证,SILC安全可行,具有切口长度小、术后疼痛轻等优点.