鲁訔的《杜甫年谱》与《编注杜甫诗》--兼及鲁訔编年系统的渊源和异同问题

摘要

鲁訔《杜甫年谱》与源于“鲁訔系统”的编年体杜集《百家注》和《草堂诗笺》蕴含了丰富的文献学信息，由此可重新检讨学者对已佚的《编注杜甫诗》的编次情况与渊源流变的看法。同时，鲁编本的支流《百家注》和《草堂诗笺》在编次上亦有异同和优劣之别。在了解二刊本的具体编次情况的基础上，学者可根据需要作合理取舍利用。%The works of Chronicles of DU FU by Lu Yin and the series of Chronological works-Baijia Zhu&Caotang Shi Jian, contains a wealth of philological information. And from what inferred by them, scholars could reconsider the basic information about the lost works, the Annotation of Du Fu’ poetry. Although there is a highly consistency between the two, Baijia Zhu&Caotang Shi Jian, in editing, the works Caotang Shi Jian, has more advantages over the works Baijia Zhu. By understanding the characteristics, the advantages and disadvantages between these two, scholars could make the best use of them when necessary.