完颜挞懒败亡及其子通蒙事迹商榷

摘要

王国维先生在讨论南宋文献中的蒙古史料时，对完颜挞懒败亡及其子通蒙叛乱提出了质疑。但通过对史籍记载的辨析可知，完颜挞懒在天眷二年被罢免后作乱北逃之说难以成立，挞懒南逃祁州合情合理、当属无疑；其子通蒙叛乱之事虽只有孤证可资，但细考其动机及条件皆成立，事理亦颇通，不应横加否定。%When Mr.Wang Guowei discussed about historical materials about Mongolia of documents of the Southern Song Dy-nasty,he questioned the destruction in defeat of Wanyandalan and his son’s secret relationship with Mongolia and rebellion.How-ever,from analysis of historical record,the theory that after Wanyandalan was removed from his office in the second year of Tian-juan reign,he fled north and staged an armed rebellion seemed to be inaccurate.The theory that Dalan fled south to Qizhou seemed more rational and undoubted.The theory that his son had secret relationship with Mongolia and rebelled only had single evident. After thoughtful consideration,its motive and condition have foundation,and the logic is also smooth,thus it cannot be disavowed flagrantly.