试论全国人大法工委法律询问答复的效力

摘要

According to China’s“legislative law”therelevant provisions of article fifty-fifth,The office of operation of the Standing Committee of National People’s Congress may study questions raised regarding specific aspects of a law and give a response.In somecases,theansweras a trialbasis by the court to apply.The legalquestionreply is notlegislative interpretation, norexplain thejudicial interpretation of thespecific applicationof similar,do not have the effectas the right totrialbasis.Legal inquiriesand replies inuniversal,compulsoryand so there are stillmany disputes,asthe validity of normsis open to discussion. Legal inquiriesand replies system reflect thepractical workneeds,the need forthe corresponding normsfurther clearand transformation.%根据我国《立法法》第55条的相关规定，全国人大常委会工作机构有对法律询问做出答复的权力。在某些具体案件的审理中，该种答复作为审判的依据被人民法院所适用。法律询问答复不是立法解释，亦非类似司法解释的具体应用解释，不具有作为有权的审判依据的效力。法律询问答复在普遍适用性、强制适用等方面仍存在着较多的争议，其作为规范的效力如何有待讨论。法律询问答复制度的存在反映实践工作的需求，需要对相应规范进一步地明确和改造。