对司法审查正当性的探讨，学者们大多是从“民主的不信任”出发的。阅读了相关资料后，可以发现，当我们正积极呼吁建立这一制度时，在其发源地美国，学者更多的却是对它的怀疑与审视。而通过了解美国学者们对司法审查正当性的争论，梳理其司法审查的渊源及发展历程，明确美国法院在不同时期的司法审查态度与政策。可以肯定的是：尽管有许多学者怀疑司法审查的正当性并且提出深刻的理论批评，但司法审查的正当性毫无疑问。%As to study on the legitimacy of judicial review, most scholars tend to distrust the democracy. After reading the related information we can found that, when we are actively called for the establishment of the system, in the originated country, the United States, scholars show more doubts and examination on it. And by understanding the American scholars arguing over the legitimacy of judicial review, combing its judicial review of the origin and development course, we can make sense of the court’s attitude and policy for judicial review. It can be sure that, although there are many scholars doubt the legitimacy of judicial review and deep theoretical criticism, there is no doubt the legitimacy of judicial review.
展开▼
