首页> 外文期刊>针灸推拿医学(英文版) >温针灸治疗慢性腹泻疗效观察
【24h】

温针灸治疗慢性腹泻疗效观察

机译:温针灸治疗慢性腹泻疗效观察

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

目的:观察温针灸治疗慢性腹泻的临床疗效.方法:将慢性腹泻患者200例,随机分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组100例采用温针灸特定穴治疗;对照组100例采用口服思密达治疗.结果:治疗组痊愈52例,显效34例,好转14例,总有效率为100.0%;对照组痊愈5例,显效23例,好转33例,无效39例,总有效率为61.0%.两组总有效率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:温针灸特定穴治疗慢性腹泻疗效优于口服思密达治疗.%Objective: To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods: Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 100 cases in the treatment group were treated with needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints. 100 cases in the control group were treated by oral administration of Smecta. Results: The therapeutic results showed cure in 52 cases, remarkable effect in 34 cases, improvement in 14 cases and the total effective rate in 100.0% in the treatment group, and cure in 5 cases, remarkable effect in 23 cases, improvement in 33 cases, failure in 39 cases and the total effective rate in 61.0% in the control group. The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints is better than oral administration of Smecta in the therapeutic effects.
机译:目的:观察温针灸治疗慢性腹泻的临床疗效.方法:将慢性腹泻患者200例,随机分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组100例采用温针灸特定穴治疗;对照组100例采用口服思密达治疗.结果:治疗组痊愈52例,显效34例,好转14例,总有效率为100.0%;对照组痊愈5例,显效23例,好转33例,无效39例,总有效率为61.0%.两组总有效率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:温针灸特定穴治疗慢性腹泻疗效优于口服思密达治疗.%Objective: To observe the therapeutic effects of needle warming moxibustion for chronic diarrhea. Methods: Two-hundred cases with chronic diarrhea were divided randomly into a treatment group and a control group. 100 cases in the treatment group were treated with needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints. 100 cases in the control group were treated by oral administration of Smecta. Results: The therapeutic results showed cure in 52 cases, remarkable effect in 34 cases, improvement in 14 cases and the total effective rate in 100.0% in the treatment group, and cure in 5 cases, remarkable effect in 23 cases, improvement in 33 cases, failure in 39 cases and the total effective rate in 61.0% in the control group. The comparison of the total effective rate between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: The needle warming moxibustion on specific acupoints is better than oral administration of Smecta in the therapeutic effects.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号