Both the property and personal rights are the basic rights of the accused , however , in coercive dispositions where rights are vulnerable to powers ,the institutional design of China ’s criminal procedure law places more weight on personal rights protection than on property rights protection. This design is not only detrimental to the defendant ’s property rights ,but also hinders the fairness and justice of criminal procedures and the credibility of the law enforcement. The criminal procedure law ’s lack of due emphasis on property rights protection is closely connected with the constitution ’s failure to give equal protection to both personal rights and private property rights. To make up this flaw of China ’s criminal procedure law , it is necessary to establish a judicial review procedure for property coercive disposition;include into the coercive system such disposition actions as distraint ,seizure ,and freezing;more clearly define the essential conditions and set a preliminary time limit for coercive disposition of properties;and establish a new relief mode for property right whereby the coercive disposition can be waived through warrant.%财产权与人身权都是被追诉人的基本权利。然而，在权利易受权力侵害的强制处分中，我国刑事诉讼法却存在重人身权但轻财产权保护的制度设计，这不仅对被追诉人财产权不利，而且有碍刑事诉讼公平正义的实现和执法公信力的提高。我国刑事诉讼法轻财产权保护，这和我国宪法对私有财产权与人身权未给予同等重视密切关联。针对我国刑事诉讼法对被追诉人财产权保护存在的不足，有必要建立对物强制处分司法审查程序；将扣押、查封、冻结等对物强制处分行为纳入强制措施体系，进一步细化对物强制处分的要件；初步设定对物强制处分的期限；构建对物强制处分可以通过担保予以解除的新型财产权救济方式。
展开▼
