两种不同通气方法在紧急心肺复苏中的效果比较

摘要

Objective: To study the ideal ventilation methods for early cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Method:78 cases of respiratory cardiacarrest patients were randomly divided into sequential balloon mask ventilation group (39 cases, first using balloon mask ventilation and then using intubation ventilation by patho-genetic condition of patients ) and intubation ventilation group (39 cases). And then compared the clinical effect of the two groups. Result:The successful rate and effective rate of balloon mask ventilation group was better than those in intubation ventilation group. Conclusion: Sequential opened air passage can help effectively and open air passage in time, improve the successful rate and effective rate.%目的:研究紧急心肺复苏的理想人工通气方式.方法:78例心跳骤停患者随机分为序贯性持续气囊-面罩通气组(先持续气囊-面罩通气后视病情行气道插管)和常规气管插管组,各39例,比较两组心肺复苏的效果.结果:持续气囊-面罩通气组的复苏成功率和存活率高于常规气管插管组.结论:序贯性气道开放能及时、有效地早期开放气道,提高复苏成功率和存活率.