氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗84例小儿哮喘的比较

摘要

目的：对氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入在治疗小儿哮喘过程中的临床效果进行分析。方法选取2011年10月至2013年10月在我院接受哮喘治疗的患儿84例为研究对象，对其治疗效果进行回顾性分析。结果观察组患者治疗总有效率以及治疗后血氧饱和度明显优于对照组，具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论氧驱动雾化吸入治疗与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗均能达到治疗的目的，但是氧驱动雾化吸入治疗的效果更好，值得临床推广。%Objective For oxygen atomization inhalation and air compressor pump atomizing inhalation in the treatment of infantile asthma clinical effect in the process of analysis. Methods From October 2011 to October 2013 in our hospital 84 cases of children with asthma treated as the research object, were analyzed retrospectively to observe the treatment effect. Result Observation group of patients after treatment the total effective rate and blood oxygen saturation was better than control group, with statistical signiifcance (P<0.05). Conclusion Oxygen atomization inhalation therapy and air compressor pump atomizing inhalation treatment can achieve the goal of treatment, but the oxygen atomization inhalation therapy effect is better, worthy of clinical promotion.