南京市大学生同性恋者与双性恋者行为现状与影响因素分析

摘要

Objective To explore homosexual and bisexual behaviors among college students,and examine the in fluence of social environment.Methods Our study used questionnaire survey research.A voluntary,anonymous and self-administered questionnaire was distributed and completed on site.Results A total of 2369 questionnaires were valid.The proportion of homosexual and bisexual among the students was 8.2％ (194/2369).Among undergraduate students,the percentage of homosexual and bisexual behaviors was higher than that of vocational college students (10.1％ vs 7.3％).The proportion of homosexual and bisexual participants who reported having engaged in sexual risk behavior,internet-related behavior,self-destructive behavior,unhealthy lifestyle,or anti-social behaviors significantly higher than that of their heterosexual counterparts.The multiple regression analysis indicated that those who reported support received from caregivers (aOR =0.71,95％ CI:0.60-0.83),and positive attitudes of classmates (aOR =0.79,95％ CI:0.62-1.00) tended not to be homosexual and bisexual;those who were identified as homosexual and bisexual were more likely to be liberal arts students (aOR =1.90,95％ CI:1.36-2.65),report excessive interference in their child's life from caregivers (aOR =1.22,95％CI:1.03-1.45),and have more bad friends (aOR=1.04,95％CI:1.01-1.06).Conclusion Parenting styles and relationships with different populations were closely related to sexual orientation among university students.The proportion of those engaging in negative behaviors among homosexual and bisexual university students was significantly higher than that among heterosexual university students.%目的 了解目前大学生同性恋者与双性恋者的行为现状和社会环境对大学生性取向的影响.方法 采用问卷调查,全部现场发放和回收问卷,问卷采用自愿和匿名自填式.结果 共收回有效问卷2369份.高等院校同性恋者与双性恋者总人数所占比例为8.2％ (194/2369),本科生中同性恋者与双性恋者总人数所占比例显著高于高职院校(10.1％ vs 7.3％);同性恋者与双性恋者大学生在“很少使用避孕套”、“总共性伴数”、“在线色情聊天”、“与网友有过一夜情”、“有自杀的念头”、“试过自杀”、“使用新型毒品”、“赌博”、“打架”、“故意破坏公共财物”方面的比例都显著高于异性恋者大学生.回归分析结果证明“抚养者的鼓励与帮助”(a OR=0.71,95％ CI:0.60～0.83)、“同学的友好态度”(aOR=0.79,95％CI:0.62～1.00)与同性恋者与双性恋者性取向呈负相关;“文科生”(aOR=1.90,95％CI:1.36～2.65)、“抚养者从小的过度干涉”(aOR=1.22,95％CI:1.03～1.45)、以及“不良朋友的人数”(aOR=1.04,95％CI:1.01～1.06)和同性恋者与双性恋者性取向呈正相关.结论 大学生同性恋者与双性恋者发生不良行为总人数的比例要显著高于异性恋者.同性恋者与双性恋者成因分析中,不同的抚养类型以及与不同人群的关系对大学生同性恋者与双性恋者性取向的形成有显著影响.