单侧多功能外固定支架固定与加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的效果比较

摘要

Objective:To explore the effect of unilateral multifunctional external fixation support fixation and compression plate internal fixation in the treatment of tibial fracture.Methods:120 patients with tibial fracture were selected.They were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group.The control group were treated with compression plate internal fixation. The observation group was treated with unilateral multifunctional external fixation support fixation.We compared the treatment effect of two groups.Results:In the observation group,operation time,incision length,operation healing and incidence rate of postoperative complications were significantly better than the control group(P<0.05).Conclusion:Compared with compression plate internal fixation,the effect of unilateral multifunctional external fixation support fixation in the treatment of tibial fracture was significant.%目的：探讨单侧多功能外固定支架固定与加压钢板内固定治疗胫骨骨折的效果。方法：收治胫骨骨折患者120例，随机分为对照组和观察组，对照组采用加压钢板内固定治疗，观察组采用单侧多功能外固定支架固定治疗，比较两组治疗效果。结果：在观察组，手术时间、手术切口长度、手术愈合情况和术后并发症发生率均明显优于对照组(P＜0.05)。结论：与加压钢板内固定治疗方式相比，单侧多功能外固定支架固定治疗胫骨骨折效果显著。