At present, the number of doping cases in the sports field remains high and the forms vary, indicating that the high-pressure policy of international sports organizations on doping incident has not reached its institutional purpose. This article analyzes the situation of doping control from a global perspective by the methods of literature review, case study, historical analysis. It demonstrates that there are still two contradictions that are difficult to reconcile with regards to doping control on the international sports field, namely the increasingly strict doping control and the increasing proliferation of doping problems, as well as the growing contradiction between perfection of doping arbitration rules and the persistence of disputes in doping cases. This highlights the limitations of current ways of analyzing and solving problems. Therefore, it is necessary to break through the shackles of the old ways, to do analysis starting from the protection of the basic human rights of athletes, and to suggest that the feasible solution to the dilemma lies in thesystem of participation which allows all parties to get involved in each procedure. The essential attributes of the arbitration system determine the objective feasibility of the system of participation, and the controversy of the sports arbitration system determines the actual demand for the system of participation. The design of the participation system should mainly focus on the time and the content of participation by the parties, i.e. pre-procedures can be set before the arbitral tribunal to give the parties the right to participate in the discussion of what have happened and which rules to apply. The 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics Games should be dedicated to providing the hardware and software facilities that are conducive to expanding the involvement and engagement of the parties, ensuring the actual participation of the parties during the whole process., and enhancing the facilities that are essential for the timeliness of participation, so as to boostthe respect thatthe parties obtain from the procedures and reduce the unwillingness of the the parties when seeing the results of disputes in order to facilitate the execution of the verdicts.%当前,体育领域的兴奋剂问题数量居高不下、形式变化多样,表明国际体育组织对兴奋剂违规行为的高压政策并未达至其制度目的.采用文献资料调研、案例分析、历史分析等研究方法,对全球视域下兴奋剂管控情况进行分析,研究表明:国际体育领域在兴奋剂管控问题上仍然存在两对难以调和的矛盾,即兴奋剂管控日趋严格和兴奋剂问题屡禁不止的矛盾,以及兴奋剂仲裁规则日趋完善化和兴奋剂案件争议持续化的矛盾,凸显原有的问题分析和解决路径存在较大的局限性.因此,有必要突破原有路径束缚,以保障运动员基本人权为分析原点,提出处理困境的可行进路在于当事人亲历性的程序参与制度.仲裁制度的本质属性决定参与制度的客观可行性,体育仲裁制度的争议性决定参与制度的现实需求性.参与制度应着重围绕当事人参与事项的范围和参与的时间节点予以设计,即可在仲裁庭审开始前设置前置程序,赋予当事人参与案件的事实讨论和规则适用的权利.2022年北京冬奥会应致力于提供有利于扩大当事人亲历性、保障当事人程序参与实质性、强化参与时效性所需的软硬件设施,以增强当事人的程序尊重感,降低争议处理结果的抗拒感,以利于处理结果的顺畅执行.
展开▼
