Objective To investigate the effects of psychological intervention in the treatment of patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Methods 182 patients with irritable bowel syndrome treated in our hospital from September 2010 to September 2011 were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table, with 91 cases in each group. The observation group received effective psychological intervention treatment on the basis of conventional treatment in control group. The treatment effects of the two groups were compared. Results Two months after treatment, the SAS score and SDS score were (36.4±8.2) scores and (33.9±7.1) scores respectively in the observation group and (45.2±7.9) scores and (49.2±8.3) scores respectively in the control group. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t = 3.690, 6.730; all P < 0.05). The observation group had significantly higher effective rate than the control group, with statistically significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Conclusion The application of effective psychological intervention measures on the basis of conventional treatment can effectively improve the curative effects of patients with irritable bowel syndrome, thereby worthy of clinical promotion.%目的 探讨心理干预治疗在肠易激综合征患者之治疗中的作用.方法 将2010年9月~2011年9月我院收治的182例肠易激综合征患者按照随机数字表法随机分为观察组和对照组,各91例,观察组在对照组常规治疗的基础上对患者进行有效的心理干预治疗,比较两组治疗效果.结果 治疗2个月后,观察组患者SAS评分为(36.4±8.2)分,SDS评分为(33.9±7.1)分,对照组分别为(45.2±7.9)分和(49.2±8.3)分,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(t = 3.690、6.730;均P < 0.05).观察组治疗有效率明显高于对照组,组间比较差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05).结论在常规治疗的基础上根据患者的心理状态采取有效的心理干预措施进行辅助治疗,可有效提高肠易激综合征患者的治理效果,值得临床推广.
展开▼
机译:鲁道夫·H·穆斯(Rudolf H. Moos)的“社会心理干预的医源性影响:治疗,生活情境和个人危险因素”,以及萨姆·希尔德斯(Sam Schildhaus)和伯纳德·杜戈尼(Bernard Dugoni)的“过早死亡是最终的失败:美国吸毒者治疗人群的死亡预测因素”。知道什么起作用和什么不起作用会导致更好的治疗和干预?